<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitch Williams on 106.7 inre Strasburg Shutdown, Mechanics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nationalsarmrace.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nationalsarmrace.com/?p=4384</link>
	<description>&#34;... the reason you win or lose is darn near always the same - pitching.”  -- Earl Weaver</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Boss</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalsarmrace.com/?p=4384&#038;cpage=1#comment-5104</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalsarmrace.com/?p=4384#comment-5104</guid>
		<description>Inre television and (more likely) radio hosts, I wonder how much of their opinion stating is just to draw viewership and to spark interest?  Maybe its more of a problem for radio, where you do a segment then do a series of phone calls, and the more ridiculous your stance the more phone calls you&#039;ll field.  I feel especially that Steve Czabin is guilty of this; taking a ridiculous stance on something just to then have a fake argument about it with his co-hosts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inre television and (more likely) radio hosts, I wonder how much of their opinion stating is just to draw viewership and to spark interest?  Maybe its more of a problem for radio, where you do a segment then do a series of phone calls, and the more ridiculous your stance the more phone calls you&#8217;ll field.  I feel especially that Steve Czabin is guilty of this; taking a ridiculous stance on something just to then have a fake argument about it with his co-hosts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clark17</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalsarmrace.com/?p=4384&#038;cpage=1#comment-5102</link>
		<dc:creator>clark17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalsarmrace.com/?p=4384#comment-5102</guid>
		<description>My opinion is the same as yours on Strasburg. I&#039;d love to have him keep pitching, but shutting him down is just a no-brainer.

Meanwhile, my opinion of former players who become analysts couldn&#039;t be lower. Whether it&#039;s Curt Schilling or Mitch Williams or Harold Reynolds, these guys get on TV because of the absurd assumption that just because you had the physical talent to play a sport means you must have the mental talent to insightfully analyze it. This mistake isn&#039;t unique to baseball, of course. Just look at the awful parade of players who get hired and fired to co-host Monday Night Football every year or two. But especially with baseball, the analysts I most want to hear are the writers, the students of the game. Guys like Peter Gammons, Buster Olney, Tim Kurkjian, Tom Boswell, Richard Justice. Sure, they&#039;re often wrong, too, but they&#039;re far less inclined to be show-offs or to make controversial remarks just to draw attention to themselves (with some exceptions... I&#039;m looking at you, Skip Bayliss). It&#039;s a generalization, of course, but I just find most former players to be insufferable analysts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion is the same as yours on Strasburg. I&#8217;d love to have him keep pitching, but shutting him down is just a no-brainer.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, my opinion of former players who become analysts couldn&#8217;t be lower. Whether it&#8217;s Curt Schilling or Mitch Williams or Harold Reynolds, these guys get on TV because of the absurd assumption that just because you had the physical talent to play a sport means you must have the mental talent to insightfully analyze it. This mistake isn&#8217;t unique to baseball, of course. Just look at the awful parade of players who get hired and fired to co-host Monday Night Football every year or two. But especially with baseball, the analysts I most want to hear are the writers, the students of the game. Guys like Peter Gammons, Buster Olney, Tim Kurkjian, Tom Boswell, Richard Justice. Sure, they&#8217;re often wrong, too, but they&#8217;re far less inclined to be show-offs or to make controversial remarks just to draw attention to themselves (with some exceptions&#8230; I&#8217;m looking at you, Skip Bayliss). It&#8217;s a generalization, of course, but I just find most former players to be insufferable analysts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
