Comments on: Gonzalez to play in WBC: why this is really Bad News for the Nats

By: John C.

John C. — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:58:19 +0000

The WBC is not in the interests of any individual MLB team. It is, however, in the best interests of the sport. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, and all that. I have no problem with the WBC as a concept, although I do agree that it may work better if it overlapped with the Arizona Fall League instead of taking away from Spring Training.

By: Todd Boss

Todd Boss — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:33:42 +0000

Can’t say I’ve ever seen a study for this. But it would seem to make sense; nobody would have even thought to invite Mike Trout a year ago; now he’d be the #1 target to play.

It seems to me that the US team is sort of just trying to get whoever they can to play, while the foreign teams for the most part field their #1 teams (with a couple of exceptions).

By: Sec3 My Sofa

Sec3 My Sofa — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:13:03 +0000

The WBC is not an annual event, but are the players, and especially the pitchers, more likely to participate after they’ve had an unusually good year?

By: Mark L

Mark L — Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:19:45 +0000

More Props to to Todd ‘options guru’ Boss over at Nats Prospects.
Try not to get too big of a head.

By: Todd Boss

Todd Boss — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:22:05 +0000

Espinosa; i’m guessing he didn’t want to lose his spot, so he hid the injury. But we have no idea how much the team knew or didn’t know. If the team knew, why not disclose it earlier? It seemed so random when the injury was announced.

By: Wally

Wally — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:48:20 +0000

Plus, best that I can tell, the World Cup is considered bigger than the professional soccer leagues, so while the owners don’t like it, much of their fan base might react negatively to the team withholding the players services. The opposite is true here, I think. (I should caveat the above by saying that I don’t really follow soccer, so I may be easily mistaken on what the fans want to see).

The other benefit of the winter timing for WBC is that if someone does get hurt, at least there is something of an offseason to recover, without impacting any real games. It won’t help with a catastrophic pitching injury, but will with 90% of the rest of the injuries.

Saw that Espy asked out of playing in the WBC due to ‘continued strengthening of his shoulder’. I am happy that he isn’t playing, but I have to echo what has been said many times by everyone else: it sure doesn’t seem like a good call to avoid surgery right after last season. I wonder where the team came out on this. Do you think that they encouraged him to put it off, or whether it was his call alone? While I don’t feel great about the Nats medical staff generally, with my sense of Rizzo and especially coming off almost the exact thing with ALR in 2011, it seems like he would tell Espy to get the surgery.

By: Todd Boss

Todd Boss — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:38:21 +0000

I think I like the concept of the WBC, in as much as I really enjoy what the World Cup has become for the soccer world. But trying to establish a “World Cup” of baseball with firmly established professional leagues (and worse, one incredibly dominant one in MLB) has turned the event into the exhibition that it essentially is. In soccer, the World Cup existed long, long before the rise of professional leagues as we now know them, and thus clubs are more or less resigned to the fact that they pay the wages of players who may (and often do) get hurt while on international duty, and whose performaces on the field absolutely are affected afterwards. The worst example in Soccer is what just finished yesterday; the African Cup of Nations, an every-2 year competition that plays all-January, smack in the middle of the professional seasons. At least the World Cup and European championships are scheduled in the summer, after all the european seasons have ended.

The NBA has a similar issue now with releasing its foreign players to play in the World Championships. Mark Cuban has been incredibly vocal on this point, correctly stating that he is paying their wages and why should he allow his pros to play elsewhere and possibly return hurt.

Wally you are exactly right; if this event was staged in November instead of March, and was played solely in climates that were baseball-playable in November (Arizona? Florida? The Carribean?) I absolutely think we’d see fewer injuries, less concern about its affect on players, etc. Hundreds of guys play in the various winter leagues without much affect, why not stage the competition then?

By: Wally

Wally — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:54:03 +0000

I don’t like the WBC and wished none of our guys played in it. To me, it seems like an exhibition series, not real baseball, and only has downside. Wished they would move it to the end of the season at least, maybe with players not in the post season.

By: Myrubberarm

Myrubberarm — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:28:14 +0000

I agree with this comment. Gio not at risk for sanctions, just embarassment. The bigger question is why the WBC even exists, other than to allow lesser countries to strut their talent by beating down the US.

By: John C.

John C. — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:36:42 +0000

The good news to me is that the invitation to Gio join the WBC (extended by Team USA Manager Joe Torre after Medlen dropped out) tells me that MLB expects that Gio will emerge unscathed from the Biogenesis swamp. Given that Torre’s day job is rules enforcer for MLB, I can’t imagine that MLB would set itself up for a black eye by adding someone they believed was up for a PED suspension to the WBC roster.