We finally get the last major pundit chiming in on the state of our system’s prospects, on this 24th day of April 2026. Eric Longenhagen and his Fangraphs crew have published their top 41 for the system. They are the last of the major pundits I track (Baseball America, MLBpipeline, Keith Law, Kiley McDaniel) plus more fringe prospect shops (Prospects1500, Prospects361, ProspectsLive, and BaseballProspectus, which hides everything behind a paywall i’m not willing to buy).
With this data, we have a complete set of “pre-2026 season” rankings for the system, and I will now work on my own such ranking. I published a top 125 at the end of last season, which had a few players ranked wildly out of place in retrospect, plus we’ve added at least 14 prospects who will feature in the top 50 or so and have released/traded at least 8-10 others who I ranked at the time, so I’ll work on a re-rank and see where things land. Ranking 125 guys out of a system that has 165 players domestically and another 30-40 in the DSL, 95% of whom won’t ever even get to Florida, may seem like a fools errand, but hey, this is what we do 🙂
Here’s the Fangraphs top 41 for our system, which seems like an odd number but is driven by the total number of our prospects who Longenhagen determines to have a Future Value (FV) of 35+ or more (FV runs on the typical scouting 20-80 scale, and anyone 50 or above is projected to be at least an “Average Everyday Player.” We’re projected to have just five of these players out of this top 41, which may temper your opinion of the system).
| Fangraphs | First Name | Last Name | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eli | Willits | SS |
| 2 | Jarlin | Susana | RHP (Starter) |
| 3 | Harry | Ford | C |
| 4 | Ronny | Cruz | SS |
| 5 | Travis | Sykora | RHP (Starter) |
| 6 | Alejandro | Rosario | RHP |
| 7 | Landon | Harmon | RHP (Starter) |
| 8 | Miguel | Sime Jr. | RHP (Starter) |
| 9 | Jackson | Kent | LHP (Starter) |
| 10 | Devin | Fitz-Gerald | SS |
| 11 | Davian | Garcia | RHP (Starter) |
| 12 | Luis | Perales | RHP (Starter) |
| 13 | Luke | Dickerson | SS/CF |
| 14 | Gavin | Fein | SS |
| 15 | Yoel | Tejeda Jr. | RHP (Starter) |
| 16 | Nauris | De La Cruz | OF (Corner) |
| 17 | Isalas | Suarez | OF (CF) |
| 18 | Samil | Serrano | OF (Corner) |
| 19 | Alex | Clemmey | LHP (Starter) |
| 20 | Abimelec | Ortiz | 1B/OF (Corner) |
| 21 | Ethan | Petry | 1B/OF (Corner) |
| 22 | Riley | Cornelio | RHP (Starter) |
| 23 | Sir Jamison | Jones | C |
| 24 | Caleb | Lomavita | C |
| 25 | Seaver | King | SS |
| 26 | Coy | James | SS |
| 27 | Marconi | German | SS |
| 28 | Eriq | Swan | RHP (Starter) |
| 29 | Christian | Franklin | OF (CF) |
| 30 | Yeremy | Cabrera | OF (corner) |
| 31 | R.J. | Sales | RHP (Starter) |
| 32 | Josh | Randall | RHP (Starter) |
| 33 | Andry | Lara | RHP (Starter) |
| 34 | Jorgelys | Mota | SS |
| 35 | Angel | Ramirez | OF (Corner) |
| 36 | Kevin | Bazzell | C |
| 37 | Angel | Feliz | SS/3B |
| 38 | Brayan | Cortesia | SS |
| 39 | Daniel | Hernandez | C |
| 40 | Jose | Feliz | RHP (Starter) |
| 41 | Sam | Brown | OF (Corner) |
Phew. There’s a lot to talk about here. I’d say at least a third of these players are ranked completely at odds with the entire rest of the industry. So, how did we get here, and what does it mean? Well, Longenhagen’s FV driven rankings is almost entirely about Ceiling, so you’re going to see teenagers who are performing ranked well higher in his methodology than you might see elsewhere, where pundits take a more balanced floor/ceiling/age approach. I’ll call out the outliers as we go.
- 1-2-3 Willits-Susana-Ford is mostly unassailable. You can quibble about not having Sykora higher, but basically every other shop has the exact same top 5 right now (these 3 plus Sykora and Fein).
- Ronny Cruz at #4. that’s crazy high; most others have him in the mid 20s if at all. Prophetic? he’s already been promoted to High-A at age 19 and showed up there and hit 2 more homers in his first three games, likely pushing Angel Feliz off Short for now.
- Rosario at #6 is also well above where anyone else has him, and I really don’t get this ranking. He didn’t pitch in 2023 after getting drafted. Sure, he looked awesome in his 2024 pro debut as he should have; he was a 3-year starter in Miami’s rotation pitching in A-ball. The problem is this: he missed all of 2025 with injury, gets traded, and THEN gets Tommy John. So he’ll miss all of 2026 and may not be ready for 2027. How is that possibly the 6th best prospect in our system? He’s going to be Rule-5 eligible this coming December with a grand total of 88 pro innings!
- He’s got Sime way higher than others, but from what we’ve seen so far in Fredericksburg this may be warranted (23 Ks in 11 innings). Sime sits right behind Harmon, who has also come out of the gate shining for F-burg.
- Jackson Kent at #9. Ok, so I like Kent, and I think his numbers aren’t flattering his capabilities so far, but top 10 in the system? For a command and control lefty? Seems high.
- He’s clearly high man on Davian Garcia at #11, who surprisingly made the AA rotation to start 2026 after barely pitching in Wilmington. Maybe there’s something to Longenhagen’s madness.
- He loves Sir Jamison Jones … who has been kind of forgotten with the Willits draft, all the other HS guys pouring in, and all the trade acquisitions. But he’s holding down the fort as starting Catcher in Low-A with all these other teenagers, which must make for a fun time on the bus rides.
- He’s got two 2026 IFA signings in his top 20 (Suarez and Serrano). Hard to pass judgement here, other than to say that Longenhagen is probably the most plugged-in guy to the DR scene.
We’ve talked about nothing but elevated prospects so far. Well, for all the guys above who are super high, there had to be guys who got knocked down.
- Gavin Fein; Top 5 on every other board and as high as #2 on Keith Law’s board … is #14 here. Interesting. He struggled in his pro debut last year, got traded, then immediately got hurt for us, with little idea of how bad it is. We know he had off-season surgery on a bone spur, which can explain his pro debut crummy numbers; is this a follow-on injury? Nobody knows.
- Alex Clemmey: What the heck is he doing at #18? Ok, so no he can’t find the plate right now, but he’s a 20yr old in AA for the second year in a row. If he was in High-A right now with a 2.47 ERA like he had last year, he’d likely be top 5. You can’t punish a guy for punching way above his weight class and not putting up sub 2.00 numbers.
- He’s a bit low on Ethan Petry, likely thinking he’s a 1B-limited bat. Fair enough. He’ll hit until he doesn’t. There’s nobody blocking his path in AA in the “1B-corner OF” realm from a top-end prospect perspective with a MLFA, a Rule-5 draftee, and a minor trade acquisition starting at 1B, LF, and DH respectively.
- Here’s where things get weird: Seaver King is at #25. Ok, that just seems ridiculous. Even if you thought he was over rated via his 2025 season … we’re still talking about a 1st round pick who is a starting SS in AA with solid numbers.
- Angel Feliz is way down at #37, nearly out of his rankings, despite mostly being an upper teen in other places. I wonder what Eric sees here.
Ranking to 41 should capture every name one could think of … but there’s some curious omissions here:
- Yohandy Morales: totally missing. Which we’re starting to see more and more of, as some believe he may be in the Andrew Pinckney camp of stalled AAA players who couldn’t even turn themselves into 4-A taxi squad guys.
- Sam Peterson; completely missing as well, and a bit more shocking. This is a guy who was top 10 in other lists, a true CF with power and speed. Not sure what we’re missing here.
- No love for our POTY Glasser, but no surprise either.
- Previous Bonus babies like Hurtado and Vaquero have dropped out.
- Shockingly, no Elijah Green. (kidding).
Conclusion: Interesting list here. It made me question some of the spots i’ve got players ranked at in my current top 100 and something draft rankings spreadsheet. I may have to go back to the drawing board.

I really appreciate how FG (and Law) rely on independent scouting and evaluations. If you read through all the notes, you get a ton of explanatory context and really persuasive analysis. I don’t always agree in the end, and they have their biases like everyone else, but their theory of the case usually holds together and makes sense better than what you see from other prospect shops.
Running through the outliers:
Ronny Cruz has a ton of helium right now and I’ll think we’ll see him shoot up a lot of lists pretty soon. I don’t think I have him as a 50 yet, but he’s getting close.
I wouldn’t quibble with moving Rosario down a couple of spots from here, but having him as a 45+ makes a ton of sense to me. This guy was a 55 or even a 60 back when he was healthy. Normal adjustments for TJ would have knocked him back to a strong 50 or a weak 55. Now this isn’t a normal TJ; there are complications and he’s missing 2 full years, but he’s still a guy with TOR upside if he can ever get back to it. A very high variance 45+ feels right to me and that puts him in that 6th to 8th range org-wide.
I’m with you on Kent being too high at 9, and seeing Davian Garcia at 11 really shocked me. Todd, I remember that I was on you a bit for having him too high at 20th! A 3 tick velo spike is interesting, but he’s walking a batter an inning and he’s not missing that many bats. Shouldn’t he be excelling at at least one of those? I guess I can come around to him being in the top 30, but this is way way too rich for my blood.
Nauris De La Cruz at 16th is also very high. I’m pretty happy to defer on DSL and even CPX players, but a lot of rookie ball guys excel one year and then vanish the next. Small samples and inconsistent opposition means lots of variance. FG gave Dashyll Tejeda a 40 last year, and now he’s off the list. So I’ll keep my enthusiasm moderate on guys like this.
EL’s been low on Fien since before the draft, and just to my eye, I find the pessimistic case on him pretty persuasive. Maybe not this low, but he’s ~12th for me and not 5th. And the FV on Clemmey is just a half grade down YoY, and it’s a reasonable case – no plus pitches, average athleticism and projection from here, basically an SP4 if he’s able to solve the command issue. I have him higher, but there’s enough logic here that you can’t simply dismiss it.
Like you, Seaver King was a name that jumped out as wrong to me, especially since Eric had him a 45+ based on some looks in AZ. And I was able to ask Eric about it in his FG chat. He mentioned a couple things. The point that made the most sense to me was that he’s scouting his defense as much worse than before. He dropped his defensive grade from 50(now)/60(future) last year to 30/45. That’s huge and would move him from being a plus SS to probably not being able stick there. I don’t know how he can be so sure that this is a stable new defensive talent level, though, and if it might be just a blip, then dropping him this much seems pretty harsh.
I don’t disagree with the report dropping Perales to a 40+, but I am sure regretting that trade. Bennett has been outstanding and might even be in line for a 50 when they do the Boston list.
All your missing names are included in unranked fringe-prospect section at the tail end of the list and EL gives each a sentence or two. He faults Glasser for lacking power and being mediocre on defense, and Pinckney, Petersen and Morales for making insufficient contact against fastballs. Hurtado, Vaquero and Green are listed as toolsy outfielders with serious, and probably fatal, swing issues. I’ve been one of the stubborn ones with Morales, but even though his surface stats are much improved YoY, he’s striking out 29% of the time and not hitting for enough power for a corner infielder. I’ve had him in the ~12th range, but I should probably move him back 10 spots.
The one surprising name that’s nowhere to be seen, even in the bulk mentions, is Alvarez. Maybe he’s a false graduate but also FG has never been in on him, so who knows. I asked that question in Eric’s chat too but did not get a response.
SMS
24 Apr 26 at 3:10 pm
I read the article when it came out yesterday, and I’ll need to re-read probably tomorrow am in bed with a coffee.
But I think I can summarise his thoughts on Morales, Pinkney and Peterson (all of whom I like to a degree and think at least deserve a cup of coffee with this season (the first 2) or next (Peterson) into “they can’t hit a good fastball consistently”….
Which would be a problem at MLB level. His take seems to be that it’s insurmountable.
And although not a prospect any more, he’s not off the Dylan Crews fan club train yet though, seemingly….
Kirkie
25 Apr 26 at 5:23 am