The first shop to try to do a major rank of Nationals prospects (Prospects1500) has dropped its rankings for our system. Let’s walk through their ranks and I’ll add some comments.
I have a draft 2025 ranking for our system that (believe it or not) goes out to 90 or so guys, which is kind of ridiculous when we currently (according to the Big Board) have 150 signed minor leaguers domestically. But, even given that my draft list is 90 deep, Prospects1500 still managed to rank three players that I don’t have in my top 90, and who have been ranked for the very first time on any list. We’ll get to them later, and discuss whether they should have even been ranked.
Here’s the top 50 for Prospects1500 in a quick table format:
| Rank | Last Name | First Name | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crews | Dylan | OF (CF) |
| 2 | House | Brady | SS/3B |
| 3 | Sykora | Travis | RHP (Starter) |
| 4 | King | Seaver | SS |
| 5 | Susana | Jarlin | RHP (Starter) |
| 6 | Morales | Yohandy | 3B |
| 7 | Clemmey | Alex | LHP (Starter) |
| 8 | Hassell III | Robert | OF (CF) |
| 9 | Cavalli | Cade | RHP (Starter) |
| 10 | Lile | Daylen | OF (CF) |
| 11 | Wallace | Cayden | 3B |
| 12 | Lomavita | Caleb | C |
| 13 | Hurtado | Victor | OF |
| 14 | Stuart | Tyler | RHP (Starter) |
| 15 | Green | Elijah | OF (CF) |
| 16 | Lara | Andry | RHP (Starter) |
| 17 | Dickerson | Luke | SS/CF |
| 18 | Vaquero | Cristian | OF (CF) |
| 19 | Bennett | Jake | LHP (Starter) |
| 20 | Pinckney | Andrew | OF (Corner) |
| 21 | Feliz | Angel | 3B/SS |
| 22 | Made | Kevin | SS |
| 23 | Ramirez Jr. | Rafael | SS |
| 24 | Rutledge | Jackson | RHP (Starter) |
| 25 | Lord | Brad | RHP (Starter) |
| 26 | Bazzell | Kevin | C/3B |
| 27 | Reifert | Evan | RHP (Reliever) |
| 28 | Feliz | Jose | RHP (Starter) |
| 29 | Baker | Darren | 2B |
| 30 | Brzykcy | Zach | RHP (Reliever) |
| 31 | Ribalta | Orlando | RHP (reliever) |
| 32 | Cruz | Armando | SS |
| 33 | Grissom | Marquis | RHP (Reliever) |
| 34 | De La Rosa | Jeremy | OF (Corner) |
| 35 | Millas | Drew | C |
| 36 | White | T.J. | OF (Corner) |
| 37 | Kent | Jackson | LHP (Starter) |
| 38 | Shuman | Seth | RHP (Starter) |
| 39 | Alvarez | Andrew | LHP (Starter) |
| 40 | Acosta | Daison | RHP (reliever) |
| 41 | Cox | Brenner | OF (CF) |
| 42 | Jones | Sir Jamison | CA |
| 43 | Choi | Hyun-Il | RHP (Starter) |
| 44 | Glasser | Phillips | SS |
| 45 | Mota | Jorgelys | SS |
| 46 | Cooper | Everett | SS |
| 47 | Chapparo | Andres | 1B/DH |
| 48 | Quintana | Roismar | 1B/OF |
| 49 | Narango | Joe | 1B |
| 50 | Pimentel | Brandon | 1B |
Now, lets do some reactions.
- Their top 5 for our system is essentially the same as every other shop’s top 5, in some order or another. You can quibble with House/Sykora for #2.
- The first bogey; Morales comes in at #6. They’re putting a ton of weight on his AA finish last year. He hit .206 in April but then .357 in September in the same league. I still think this is too high; if he’s 1B only I need to see more homers (just 7 in 435 ABs so far professionally).
- They like Daylen Lile slightly more than me, but so does everyone. Every scouting report I see on this guy says he’s a great contact hitter and a great base-runner. So, where’s the stats? Career .262 batting average (that’s elite bat-to-ball skills?) and just 50 Sbs 255 career games? A .351 OBP for his career? What am I missing here? What makes him any better than Jake Alu (career minor league slash line of .282/.342/.437 with 57 SBs in 420 minor league games, but with more power). I see a 5th OF ceiling. He’s only 22 and in AA, fair point, but he’s also going to be rule-5 eligible after 2025. Based on what you’ve seen, would you protect him right now?
- Victor Hurtado at #13. I’m at least 10 spots lower on this guy right now, and I wonder if they’re looking at the same guy I am. Their line in the link is, “Hurtado is very young but performed well in the Rookie league and has solid tools across the board. He’s one to keep an eye on in this tier.” Uh; “performed well?” He hit .218 in the DSL this season, with almost no speed, no power, and a 2/1 K/BB ratio. Did anyone check this guy’s stats before they wrote that line? Where’s the ranking for the DSL guys who actually hit this year? Missing, that’s where. We’ll get to that at the bottom when we talk about players not in their top 50.
- They’re lower on Andry Lara than they should be. Quote: “ Lara was a highly touted international signing whose results haven’t matched the ability in his four years with the organization.” Um, again, what are these guys watching? Lara, as a 22yr old, got promoted to AA after a month, then had a 3.63 ERA in 19 starts. Yes, in the macro his minor league stats don’t look that great … but year after year he’s been in leagues where he was among the youngest players there, pitchers or hitters. I’ve got Lara well inside our top 10, not buried in the teens.
- They’re a little higher on Vaquero (18) and Bennett (19) than I am. I’m just not impressed with the size of your signing bonus versus your on-the-field accomplishments. As for Bennett, maybe it isn’t fair to ding him for TJ, but after what we’ve seen from Cavalli, i’m gun shy for sure.
- Kevin Made: this guy seems to be a favorite of prospect hounds everywhere. I don’t see it. I see a guy who has no power and little speed who was the “flier prospect guy” in a deadline deal trade. I’ve got him ranked in the 30s, not just outside the top 20.
- Rutledge and Lord: a tale of two approaches. I see Lord as someone who is still proving in AAA they can be an effective starter, while Rutledge is proving he’s a 2-pitch guy who needs to be a reliever. One of these profiles has much more value than the other: can you guess which one? As a result, i’ve got Lord in the mid-teens and Rutledge outside the top 30 on my rankings, not ranked side by side like this shop.
- They’re not fans of Bazzell at all: MLBpipeline has him #14 in the system.
- Brzycky and Ribalta: i’ve said my peace on ranking relievers. I won’t rank a middle reliever in my top 30 anymore. Even the better middle relievers in our bullpen are barely worth half a win a season, and the best of them (Law and Florio last year) were in the 1.6-1.9 range). It’s far more likely we call up these two guys, they get shelled, they go back down, and they ahve negative bWAR (that describes precisely what all of these guys did in 2024: Adon, Weems, Barnes, Brzycky, Ribalta, and Willingham).
At this point we’re in the 30-50 range, so it’s a little harder to be critical, so I’ll just highlight guys that I think they’re way off on.
- Jeremy De la Rosa at #34: he hit .167 in High-A … then got promoted to AA where he hit .161. He’s now spent parts of 3 seasons in Wilmington and has not been competent. Is he a prospect at all? I mean, they have him above Millas, who a lot of readers right now think should be the backup MLB catcher. I’ve got De la Rosa 30 spots lower in my ranks.
- TJ White: see comments about De la Rosa above for the most part.
- Jackson Kent was ranked #24 by MLBpipeline but 37 by these guys; a season on the field should resolve this.
- They have little faith in Andrew Alvarez.
- They still have Brennar Cox ranked, which seems crazy at this point. Exhibit 1-A on the risks of drafting HS kids.
- Thus, its fitting that they have Sir Jamison Jones at #42, right below Cox. Another prep Catcher who could be decent, could go nowhere. What’s odd is, they put Jones in their top 50 but not a couple of DR prospects who actually hit this year (Dashyll Tejeda and Carlos Tavares). I did not have Jones in my top 90, perhaps an oversight.
- Then, perhaps the oddest rankings on their list: #49 and #50 are two 1B only guys in Naranjo and Pimentel, a MLFA and NDFA. Naranjo hit .208 in Wilmington for us in 2024. Pimentel hit .274 in Fredericksburg … as a 24-yr old man amongst kids. I didn’t have either of these guys in my top 90, but i’ve put them in the 70+ range for now.
Who’s missing?
- As mentioned above, a couple of DSL decent performers for 2024
- Cole Henry: probably not a surprise.
- No Nasim Nunez, who b-r.com has exhausting his rookie status in 2024. By service time, not by PAs. If you wanted to quibble and be like some shops that ignore service time and go by PAs/IPs, i’d have Nunez in the mid 40s.
- Not much else to mention; there’s some names outside their top 50 that have gotten a bit of prospect love in the past (Peterson, Cabrera, Brown, Saenz, etc) who don’t really merit it anymore.
That’s the first big prospect rank. What do you think?
Jake Alu was older the day they drafted him than Daylin Lile is now. you can question his prospect status but that’s hardly a fair comp. to nit-pick a bit he didn’t turn 22 until after his season a AA.
FredMD
6 Jan 25 at 1:37 pm
While I agree with many of your quibbles, I think it’s a pretty solid list. Going 50 deep on every team is a gigantic exercise, and I feel like I remember previous years being worse.
Going through:
I’m with them on Morales. Taking his whole year together, it was a 119 wRC+ as a 22 year old in AA. I’ve been kind of shocked at how far most evaluators have dropped him after he was such a draft darling. Especially since the “He was injured and raked when he got back” is at least mildly persuasive given the 147 wRC+ in AA post return. That’s babip inflated, and his ISO was disappointing – so it wasn’t all good news, but for now I have him grouped with King and Cavalli in a band after our top 4.
And then I agree with their list and have Lile, Clemmey, Hassell and Wallace in my next group. I have Lara behind them, but can see the argument that he should be in that mix. My main point of disagreement in the top 30 is really just that I’m lower on all the non-King recent draftees, but I’m ready to move them up if they show well in the first half next year.
You nail the important misses – Tejada and Taveres make so so much more sense than Pimental and Naranjo. And I don’t really care much about including or omitting Nunez and Millas, but they should have some consistent policy and stick to it. Otherwise, it looks like carelessness.
I think you’re in general too quick to drop teenagers with tools and projection but poor results. Hurtado and Vaquero and even Cox feel plausibly ranked here to me. That said, I am more agreeable to the harsher takes once they’re a bit older. For example, I also have De La Rosa, who is about to turn 23, as basically a post-prospect and off my top 50 at this point. And I also rank Made, who is 22, in the mid 30s.
The other group that I think you’re too harsh on is relief-only pitchers. One part of that is that I don’t think you can trust saves and games finished as meaningful stats in the minors and therefore shouldn’t give any extra penalties to middle relievers. But I also think you’re inflating the value of non-relief prospects that are ranked in that same band. Yes, relievers have capped value, but they’re also way more likely to make the 40 and provide some value at some point in their careers.
Here’s what I mean. Ignoring Rutledge, who I think is still being graded here as a possible starter, the highest ranked relief prospects are Reifert (27th), Brzykcy (30th), Ribalta (31st) and Grissom (33rd). Compare that to J Feliz (28th), Baker (29th), Cruz (32nd), and De La Rosa (34th). J Feliz looks promising, but he signed with no hype and hasn’t pitched stateside yet. How far are you willing to project based on 50 innings in the DR? Baker had a hot cup of coffee in the majors and because of that may end up leading this cohort in career WAR, but he’s limited to 2B or LF and has never had an impact bat. I’d say his ceiling is pretty capped too. And I don’t think you’ll disagree that Cruz and JDLR aren’t even really prospects at this point. If we had the chance to trade Ribalta, say, for some other team’s version of one of those four guys, I sure wouldn’t do it.
My point is that almost all prospects are extremely flawed and unlikely to provide significant value. Even guys like House and Sykora have bust rates of like 30%. Guys on the backend of top 30s pretty much all have capped upside and bust rates 80%+. I think we actually have a pretty deep system, but I think ranking our best relief-only arms in the 25-35 range is absolutely correct.
SMS
6 Jan 25 at 2:41 pm
@fredMD: Lile vs Alu was, of course, stat based and not age based. I’ve been pretty consistent on Lile in all my writings. I just don’t see stars when i see this guy, never have. Would love to be proven wrong, but there’s no stand-out skill.
BA grades for Lile: Hit: 55. Power: 45. Speed: 50. Fielding: 50. Arm: 45.
So, translating, he’s a non-plus defender with a weak arm, which means he’ll never be better at CF than Crews, Young, Wood, so that means a corner OF. But with a 45 arm that means no Right field … so now you’re talking a 5’11” left fielder with no power. Uh … LF is where you stick your power hitting OF who can’t play the other two positions. So …where does Lile play in a modern outfield?
Furthermore, he’s a 50 speed but has almost no SB history, and his best tool his 55 hit tool is a career .262 hitter in the minors.
And this is a top 10 system prospect?
Todd Boss
6 Jan 25 at 3:08 pm
SMS: multiple points.
– I hope you’re right on Morales and he picks up where he left off.
– I am quick to drop DSL and teenagers. Because they havn’t done jack. Call it “Yasel Antuna” syndrome: i don’t care what your signing bonus was; until you produce in a domestic league, youre edge case prospect at best. And, if you frigging get $3M and hit .219 in the DSL, then holy cow there better be a good explanation.
– Relievers in the minors. Yes, they’re important pieces to produce as a system, but they’re not prospects. Is Baker a prospect? No, b/c his ceiling is backup middle infielder. Farm systems need to generate near-zero WAR players to fill out the back ends of rosters; middle infielders, 4th outfielders, 6th/7th bullpen RHP arms; just because a guy like Ribalta is on track to pitch a few dozen low-leverage mop up innings doesn’t mean he’s a prospect. Furthermore, every reliever is a failed starter. Mariano Rivera; couldn’t cut it as a MLB starter, but was one of the best relievers in history. A reliever in AA? not a prospect. Matt frigging Cronin: 214 Ks in 162 career IPs in the minors and wasn’t even protected in rule5 minor league phase.
I mean, I also get that you get below 20th best prospect in a system and … well if 1 or 2 of those guys makes the majors it’s a huge surprise. So a lot of this is splitting hairs. Fair enough. But it Happens. Jacob Young didn’t appear on a prospect list for basically his first two years playing here, then was in the 30+ range. now he’s a gold glove calibre guy.
Todd Boss
6 Jan 25 at 3:23 pm
Here’s an interesting comparison:
Stats 2023-2024
Player A: 84 wRC+, .212/.285/.371/.656, 21 HR, 27 SB, OF who plays mostly CF, played across A, A+ and AA, turns 23 next week
Player B: 85 wRC+, .229/.322/.324/.646, 14 HR, 30 SB, OF who plays mostly CF, played across A, A+, AA and AAA, turned 23 in August
You may have figured it out by now, but A is de la Rosa and B is Hassell. I really don’t get the difference in ratings between the two guys, besides prospect fatigue for de la Rosa. I’d drop Hassell significantly, and have all but written off de la Rosa too.
It’s also curious that Millas and Chaparro feature as low as they do, despite putting up decent-to-very good major league numbers already. Millas has already been worth 0.5 WAR in his short major league career, which is 100% certain to be better than all but 3 or 4 guys (if we’re lucky) ahead of him on this list. That HAS TO count for something.
Otherwise, I’m kind of splitting hairs by expecting Dickerson a few notches higher, Green a few lower, and the relievers generally a few spots higher. But we’ve already debated this, so I won’t belabor the point. The relievers, in general, are pretty accurately ordered, so again, it’s not a big deal.
Altogether, this is a pretty solid list for a site that isn’t specialized to Nats coverage. Maybe they’ve been checking their work here?
Will
6 Jan 25 at 4:18 pm
Here’s another comparison:
2024
Player A: 94 wRC+, .208/.293/.355/.648, .147 ISO, 13 HR, 39 SB, CF, turned 21 a month ago
Player B: 115 wRC+, .204/.352/.349/.701, .144 ISO, 8 HR, 29 SB, RF, turns 21 in May
Both played exclusively in Fredericksburg, and were even drafted in the same year (2022)
You also probably guessed it, but A is Elijah Green and B is Brenner Cox, and yet many still consider Green a high rated prospect and Cox a non-factor. If you’re still willing to ignore Green’s 3 years of performances and dream of his tools, it’s only fair to keep the flame burning for Cox too, who was considered quite a coup to get in the 4th round back in 2022.
Will
6 Jan 25 at 4:31 pm
@KW – I get that sometimes it’s required because of small sample sizes, but I don’t think it usually makes sense to combine stats across minor league levels because variations in opposition, as well as league and park averages, can be so distorting.
With that in mind, I offer this possibly fairer comparison between Hassell and JLDR:
Hassell, in 2024 as a 22 year old in AA hit .271/.357/.371 for a wRC+ of 113 (264 PAs). JLDR, in 2024 as a 22 year old in AA hit .161/.239/.298 for a wRC+ of 53 (180 PAs).
Perhaps that is why most evaluators perceive a meaningful gap between the two.
SMS
6 Jan 25 at 7:00 pm
I have to laugh at the concept of making even longer lists, including more and more guys who will never even see Harrisburg. When I did the top arms and top bats lists for Luke’s site, I struggled to come up with nine potential starting pitchers for the arms, and threw in Grissom for good measure (he’s ranked too low here). But there are a number of guys beyond the big names with varying degrees of promise like Lord, Stuart, Clemmey, and Alvarez (despite what this list thinks of most of them).
With the hitters, egad. It was NOT a good year for bats in the organization, at all. Beyond Wood, the hitter who had the second-best season was . . . Glasser? Maybe? He’s a 24-year-old senior signee with a best-case ceiling comparable to Jake Noll. Good for him, but . . .
On the bats posts on Luke’s site, Will and I both documented the total lack of power in the organization. And let’s face it, folks, it’s a power game now. You’re looking for middle infielders who can top 20 homers. ANY power surges in 2025 would be most welcome.
Anyway, I’m not that concerned with who got ranked 34th instead of 24th. I’m concerned with the very small handful of guys who can make or break (keep broken?) this franchise. There were Harper comps on Crews, or at least Rendon ones. We were told that he was a generational, can’t-miss talent. He certainly hasn’t failed, but he’s also not close to setting the world on fire yet. Start by taking some walks, superstar. Be more selective.
Next comes House, who slashed .241/.297/.402 across two levels last summer. They promoted him to AAA when he was hitting .234. Can’t take a walk to save his life. John C. in particular has been telling us all winter not to count on House too much and too soon with the big club in 2025, and he’s right.
I’m not dismissing these dudes. They have star talent, maybe superstar talent, and they’ve already made a lot more with it than Green and Vaquero have. But they’ve also still got to prove that they can take the next steps to be quality MLB players. Their former AAA teammate Carter Kieboom can tell them not to take that for granted.
Sykora also seems to have star-level talent, but A ball is a long way from Half Street. Susana had times where he looked just as dominant, and times where he didn’t. We need our studs to truly turn out to be MLB studs.
(Along those lines, I’m confounded like the rest of you by the unwillingness of the gurus to highly rank Lara now that he’s actually living up to the hype that they were giving him a couple of years ago.)
A lot of the draft guys loved Seaver King . . . but he only played one year of D1 ball, and only 30 games at SS in college. So he’s a total unknown until he actually does something.
I’ll back SMS on continuing to back Morales. He struggled with some injuries, so he really has an incomplete right now. (I’d say the same about Bennett on the pitching side, someone I was high on before he lost the season.) The other thing to note with Morales is that they pushed him, Crews, and Pinckney all the way to AA for their first full pro seasons. That’s a big ask. Will they do the same with King and Lomavita? If they’re that afraid of the Wilmington ballpark, then they need to do something about it (move in the fences?).
I agree with the skepticism that Lile can show enough power to be a corner OF. I also agree that he’s still young and might grow into more. This time last offseason I was floating the question of who ya got for the third OF of the future: Lile, Hassell, or Pinckney? Or Green or Vaquero if you’re a real optimist. Well, here we are another year later with no additional clarity, but with Jacob Young having thrown down an ante to beat. For the record, I wouldn’t be surprised if Hassell surprises us. I’m not counting on it, but I think it’s more of a possibility than most here will buy.
Who is missing from the top 50? I’ll put a nickel on Randal Diaz, 5th-round pick, who had an outstanding season at the plate for Indiana State. (On the draft flip side, I see nothing in Jackson Kent’s numbers that encourage me.)
But a new season is on the horizon, and they’re ALL gonna be great, right?
KW
6 Jan 25 at 7:37 pm
@SMS, you’re responding to Will, not me. I still have some (probably irrational) hope that injuries have been holding Hassell back and that he’ll eventually look like the #8 overall draft pick he once was. Of course at this point we’d take him looking like a potential 4th OF.
KW
6 Jan 25 at 7:41 pm
And we also have the totally forgotten Cade Cavalli down at #9. IF he can make it fully back, he’s still a potential #1-2 starter. He won’t be that this year, but it’s still possible. If given the choice of any guy ranked ahead of him or Cavalli, how many of them would you take ahead of Cade?
KW
6 Jan 25 at 8:19 pm
@Todd – That’s a really interesting comment about players with similar capped upside to relievers (ie bench roles) not being prospects at all, and I think I need to think a bit more about it. But my initial reactions are:
1. A good bench bat or spot starter is very easily worth 1 WAR per year, and a 3-4 year arc of that production at or near a league minimum salary provides $20M in surplus value. If a player were available to be drafted with that as a ceiling and a 50-50 shot at achieving it, I don’t believe there’s any chance they’d get past the 2nd round.
2. A non-elite reliever isn’t quite that good, and probably is worth more like 0.5 WAR per year, but – unless they get assigned to close games – arbitration never gets too expensive, so you might get 6 years of value despite the low ceiling. That has decent value – we just got 2 years of a very good 1B for 5 years of a relief arm that might become elite and might bust, but is probably expected to be in this exact range: good and useful but not elite. That required him to show the potential in the majors for a season, so it’s not an apples to apples comp. But every one of these relief “prospects” is a bite at that apple, and even if it’s 4 busts for every success, I think that justifies ranking the better ones in the 25-30 range.
3. That all said, I could get behind a structure that was three separate lists. One, real prospects, and the length would vary from 15 to 25 based on the depth in the system. Two, folks tracking to have somewhat like shots at low ceiling roles. (These would almost all be from AA or AAA.) Three, folks who are very likely to bust but have interesting upside. And the last two lists wouldn’t need to be ranked, which would save us from the slightly silly hair splitting.
SMS
6 Jan 25 at 8:22 pm
@KW + Will – Oh, yes, I was responding to Will. Sorry about the misattribution! I’m probably between you two on Hassell, but honestly I think his ranking is justified even if it’s “likely usable OF4 and a small chance for more”.
SMS
6 Jan 25 at 8:24 pm
@SMS: Here’s some quick analysis looking at the Nats’ “fringe” players collectively last year on this same topic:
o bWAR of backup middle infielders Vargas, Nunez, Baker, Lipscomb: 0.1 combined between the four
o bWAR of backup outfielders: we didn’t really have “4th outfielders” this year in the definition of this conversation.
o bWAR of backup catchers Adam, Millas: 0.6
o bWAR of middle-relief RHPs: JBarnes, MBarnes, Rainey, Weems, Salazar, Adon, Rutledge, Brzycky, Ribalta, Willingham: -0.9 for all 10 guys collectively.
o (for comparison): bWAR of high-leverage 8th/9th inning guys: Finnegan, Law, Harvey, Floro: 4.5
This is just one team, for one year, but it supports what i’m saying. Throw together all your backup infielders, your 4th outfielders, your backup catchers, and all your backup RHP relievers and you get basically half your roster just treading water form a performance perspective. But our four best relievers? More than all those RHPs combined.
I think this really comes into play when evaluating ceiling of players. I’ll use Daylen Lile as a simple example: he’s not known for being a plus defender, which will push him out of CF. He does not have a great arm, which will push him to LF. He doesn’t have great power, so unless he’s hitting .300 in the majors consistently with gap power, he’ll be sat in favor of a prototypical “slugging outfielder who you “hide” in left field” type. So … to me Lile’s ceiling is as a 4th outfielder. Maybe he hits well enough that a team gives up defense in CF and sticks him there … but man he better hit. But that’s not what we’re seeing in the minors: i’m not seeing a guy tear up A ball to a .350 tune. We’re seeing good but not amazing batting averages.
Todd Boss
7 Jan 25 at 11:31 am
@Todd – First, a few quibbles. I don’t think it’s fair to combine production across a group of prospects like that. Adon’s failures don’t devalue Lara, and Kieboom’s bust doesn’t mean House isn’t a prospect. By bWAR, Nunez was worth 0.7 lat year. If you believe that’s a sustainable level of production, that’s not bad for a bench piece, and I’d say that a 1 in 4 shot at that is worth more than the expected surplus value of, say, Jose Feliz, just to pick a random fringe prospect that we all agree actually shows some promise.
And, on the relievers, you dropped the most successful call-up in Ferrer, and are including some arms that are only listed because they were bad. Neither Barnes belongs in this comparison set, and really Weems and Rainey don’t either. And Adon is exactly the kind of failed or failing starter that you seem to be arguing should stay on the top 30 lists. The one-year, one-team analysis of minor league relievers being called up to the big league team should be Ferrer, Salazar, Ribalta, Brzycky and Willingham. By bWAR, I get 0.5, 0.5, -0.1, -0.3, and -0.1, for a total of +0.5. And I think even that undervalues the actual contribution because, when you looks at innings pitched by each of them, Salazar and Ferrer did decent volume for a rookie reliever (~30 IP) and the other 3 pitched a total of 10 IP. So I think you can say that the team found two useful relievers, rather than then team got a half-win of production.
Setting aside whether you believe Brzycky and Ribalta’s can meaningfully improve and find success in the majors, the value provided by Ferrer and Salazar supports ranking Grissom or Reifert as highly as they are.
Perhaps more substantively, I want to say that I’m finding your bear case on Lile pretty persuasive. I still don’t see how I can rank him meaningfully below Hassell, but I am coming around to knocking both of them back a few places. Right now I have them 8th and 10th, and I’m thinking they should be more like 12th and 13th. And I agree that, for each of them, a lot their potential value comes from futures where they are useful bench pieces.
If we’re rounding the value of those contributions to zero, they should probably fall even father. Actually, that brings up an interesting thought experiment. I’d say Green is the most boom-or-bust bat in the system. There really isn’t a very likely future where he moderately improves and becomes a useful bench piece. He either fixes his swing and generates 4 WAR a year, or never makes enough contact to roster. I think we all agree that the chances of the former are very small, but not zero.
If we stipulate that Green is more likely to get MVP votes than Lile or Hassell, but also way way more likely to completely bust, enough so that his average expected production is distinctly lower – should Green be ranked higher than Lile or Hassell?
Because I think that’s my biggest push back on dropping these relievers. If I’m only ranking prospects who I can reasonably project into 2+ WAR/yr roles, I run out names pretty quickly.
SMS
7 Jan 25 at 2:01 pm
Combining WAR across dozens of players: i mean, yes that’s a fair point. I guess my larger point was … for every half a win reliever there’s another one to offset him. For Nunez’ positive 0.7 there’s Vargas’ negative war of about the same value.
I did ignore the lefties (including Ferrer) b/c to me, lefty relievers are a little rarer and are more of a special case. You don’t have to be nearly the talent if you’re a lefty to make the majors and stick in the bullpen.
Hassell vs Lile: I have stayed more positive on Hassell than Lile, because he’s a true CF and has better tools across the board. BA’s same scouting grades for both:
– Hassell: Hitting: 60. Power: 45. Speed: 55. Fielding: 55. Arm: 55
– Lile: Hitting: 55. Power: 45. Speed: 50. Fielding: 50. Arm: 45.
So, Hassell projects to have a better hit tool, more speed, better fielding, and significantly better arm.
Todd Boss
7 Jan 25 at 3:53 pm
Going to BA’s tool grades is begging the question because other evaluators don’t agree.
Both FG and Pipeline have Lile a half grade better on hit and power. FG also has Lile as a half grade faster. Everyone agrees that Hassell has the better arm.
Lile also had a lower K% and a higher ISO than Hassell in AA last year despite being more than a year younger. I get Hassell projecting better defensively, and that flexibility makes him more valuable as an OF4, if nothing else, but I think Lile has a slightly better offensive profile and they’re similar enough that I’m going to bet on the younger prospect.
But look, they’re close and, if you’re higher on Hassell, that’s not something I’ll fight you on. My dissonance around it is that – these two aren’t lockdown future stars but they’re very clearly real legit prospects. They have tools, and projection, and pedigree, and above average performance at a young age in the upper minors. I’m not sure any team has even 20 guys so valuable. And yet, if we’re going to round down future value that comes from filling bench roles and middle relief and spot starts, these two guys have barely any value left. Your case for how unlikely Lile is to fill a starting role is very persuasive, and I guess we can dream on a huge leap forward from Hassell’s and in his 99th percentile outcome, his 4 WAR/yr displaces JY’s 3. But that’s not at all likely and I’m not sure I can justify ranking either one on their 2+ WAR/yr outcomes alone. And if they’re the borderline cases, forget top 50s, we should be doing top 15s. And then I’d agree that we can ignore any relief-only arms.
SMS
7 Jan 25 at 6:29 pm
Hassell being so highly rated is purely a product of inertia. These prospect watchers aren’t sitting down and watching all 50 prospects on this list (because I’d love to see their in game notes on Victor Hurtado’s performance in the DSL). They’re taking old scouting reports from other scouts and regurgitating them with some lightly updated analysis. Todd has already critiqued this in his post, particularly on Hurtado and Lara, but it’s the same case for Hassell. He’s still living off the reputation he got in 2020 as a HS prospect and the good start to his career in 2021. But you simply cannot seriously make the claim that Hassell has a 60 hit tool and 45 power in 2025. It’s preposterous. Since he joined the Nats organization in 2022 and across nearly 1100 plate appearances – a very solid sample size – Hassell has hit .227, with a .317 SLG (.090 ISO). A 60 rating represents an elite skill that perhaps 10-20 other players in MILB possess (65 puts you in the top 5-10, and 70+ is top 5, if not the best). Likewise, 45 is average. A .090 ISO is no where near to average. Even if you take the highest ISO Hassell has ever posted at any level with the Nats org (his 15 games in Fredericksburg in 2023) he posted a .113 ISO, which is also not close to average.
Altogether, this raises an interesting point about why some prospects stubbornly retain their prospect status, while others tumble after even the slightest struggles, a point that has littered this post and discussion. Hassell has been terrible for 2.5 seasons now, and he’s still clinging to the 8th spot. I can’t help but associate Hassell with Yasel Antuna, who for some infuriating, inexplicable reason, both the Nats and scouts gushed over for years, based solely on a hefty signing bonus and a good first season (which was never repeated again), conveniently ignoring everything else that came after.
Meanwhile Yohandy Morales, who people were touting as a fringe top 100 prospect less than a year ago has basically fallen just as low as Hassell. Morales warrants some criticism, as he was a, mostly, bat-only pick, and the power hasn’t developed as expected, the bat has still been very good. He’s hitting a remarkable .308 across his minor league career, with a BB% above 10%, and a modest .138 ISO. If you ask me, that looks like what a 60 Hit, 45 Power prospect should look like, and yet FanGraphs already dinged his scouting report to merely 30/35 Hit, and 35/55 game power, 60/60 raw power. I’d be curious what BA says about him.
Then you’ve got a guy like Tyler Dyson, who at one point was considered a potential 1-1 pick, with an elite fastball and good secondary pitches, but after injury in college fell to the 5th round for us, and was basically considered a non-prospect after that. Why did he fall so precipitously compared to Cade Cavalli, whose injury record is exceptionally worrying?
Then you’ve got Andry Lara, who’s weirdly a combination of the above. He was stubbornly drop-proof for several seasons, despite very mediocre performances. He wasn’t missing a ton of bats, and his control needed work, but because of the tools and potential he stuck in and around our top 10. But bizarrely, Lara finally has a breakout season where the performance begins to align with the potential, and he yet he drops further down the list!
Will
8 Jan 25 at 4:44 am
Will, your bewilderment deals with how to handle a prospects tools. statistics best analyze results but tools indicate potential. also circumstances such as injury complicate the matter.
I would watch games where Antuna looked like the next Tony Gwynn. he just couldn’t do it consistently. and if you look at the careers of most all players except the stars you see this same issue.
FredMD
8 Jan 25 at 8:20 am
All AA numbers from 2024, all with at least 51 games:
A: .274 BA, .343 OBP, 125 wRC+, 7.6% BB, 23.7% K, age 22
B: .269 BA, .362 OBP, 119 wRC+, 11% BB, 24.5% K, age 22
C: .271 BA, .351 OBP, 113 wRC+, 11% BB, 20.8% K, age 22
D: .234 BA, .310 OBP, 110 wRC+, 7.8% BB, 24.5% K, age 21
E: .255 BA, .343 OBP, 108 wRC+, 10.4% BB, 18.4% K, age 21
F: .259 BA, .328 OBP, 102 wRC+, 7.4% BB, 26.7% K, age 23
Crews (A), Morales (B), Hassell (C), House (D), Lile (E), Pinckney (F).
KW
8 Jan 25 at 10:16 am
A Gwynn comp for Antuna, that’s certainly a new one!
Maybe I didn’t explain myself well. My bewilderment is with why some player’s tools get downgraded while others’ don’t. Why did Tyler Dyson go from having the potential to being a super elite prospect to be a non-entity in the span of 12 months? Why did Morales see a similar but less dramatic downgrade of his potential less than 12 months into his debut, meanwhile if Hassell could just figure out how to get strong and hit for power AND make good contact, then he’ll be a superstar and live up to that 60 hit tool! The potential doesn’t disappear, the likelihood of reaching that potential just gets smaller.
And then at what point does performance outweigh potential? How many years does Antuna (or Hassell) have to display poor contact ability before one can determine he’s not the second coming of Tony Gwynn, or even Tony Gwynn Jr.? If we only evaluated prospects on their tools, Elijah Green would be our #1 prospect, maybe one of the best in baseball. But obviously performance plays a big part, and thus Green’s contact problems and subsequent struggle to hit above the Mendoza line have caused his stock to plummet down to 15th. Meanwhile, Hassell is struggling to make good contact and hit above the Mendoza line for a longer time than Green’s professional career, and yet he’s still retained a a considerable portion of his potential.
I know I place much more emphasis on actual performance than hypothetical potential than most. It’s why it’s all a bit silly that Hassell, looking kind of best case scenario to be a 4th OF type player worth around 1 WAR/season, warrants placement at 8th (though you could add Lile or Pinckney here too), and yet Drew Millas has already posted 0.5 WAR in 31 games of play, which is pace for a 3-4 WAR/season, and no one bats an eye that he’s placed at 35th, behind Armando Cruz, who’s proven incapable of getting his SLG above .280 outside of Rookie ball. But Millas’ tools aren’t loud limiting his future potential, and if Armando Cruz can learn how to play baseball, he could end up being the next Jose Altuve.
Will
8 Jan 25 at 10:17 am
Wallace at AA before the trade:
.282 BA, .350 OBP, 120 wRC+, 6.4% BB, 18.6% K, age 22
KW
8 Jan 25 at 10:21 am
the greater the tools the longer the leash. they never know when the next Brent Rooker is right in front of them
there are very few scouting reports that I value now that John Sickels is gone. lists have even less meaning for me
nothing in your last two posts acknowledge Hassell’s wrist injury(s). a serious condition for a hitter.
FredMD
8 Jan 25 at 10:49 am
Multiple hand and wrist injuries for Hassell, plus the trade, and probably too-rapid promotion. He’ll be a major-leaguer, probably this year. Time will tell whether he’ll be any good, but that could be said of all of them.
KW
8 Jan 25 at 11:57 am
Rooker, who was my “draft crush” in 2017 when they took the Knucklehead, didn’t truly make it in the majors until age 28, which is extraordinarily late. Sometimes it take time. Souza is a prime example in the Nats’ system. At age 22 he hit only .228 at the A+ level, the year following the season when he had basically been sent home.
KW
8 Jan 25 at 12:04 pm
But again, Elijah Green has the loudest tools of anyone on the farm. Why does he drop quicker than Hassell? (MLB Pipeline has him all the way down to 21st!)
And Hassell’s wrist injury is indeed worrying, especially since it still seems to be an issue for him over two years after suffering it!
I too was a big fan of Sickels and was sad to see him stop. But I do have other prospect reporters that I think do a very good job. Keith Law can be prickly, but he goes to Blue Rocks games often, so I’ll give extra weight to his takes on our guys who pass through there.
I also like Longenhagen at Fangraphs, as he shares my perspective on striking a better balance between performance and potential (for example, he had Millas at #8 in 2024’s list). Though he was also one of the most down on Morales. Also the downside is that Longenhagen is based in Arizona, so he often doesn’t get a chance to see Nats players.
Will
8 Jan 25 at 12:20 pm
Hassell had the Hamate bone in 2023, while Morales did something bad to his thumb in 2024.
the BA grades were both from Feb 2023 for Lile vs Hassell. Here’s MLBPipeline’s tools right now online:
Lile: Scouting grades: Hit: 55 | Power: 45 | Run: 55 | Arm: 45 | Field: 50 | Overall: 45
Hassell: Scouting grades: Hit: 50 | Power: 40 | Run: 55 | Arm: 55 | Field: 55 | Overall: 45
Fangraphs tool grades, since we’re on the same topic (present/future grades)
Lile: Hit: 30/50 | Game Power: 30/45 | Raw power 40/50 | Speed: 60/60 | Field 30/45
Hassell: Hit: 40/45 | Game Power: 30/40 | Raw power 40/45 | Speed: 55/55 | Field 45/50
So, Here, Lile has jumped Hassell in both Hit and Power in the last year, and he’s increased his run tool to equal Hassell. In fact, Fangraphs has Lile now with better speed. Both shops still agree on arm and field being a significant differentiator.
The thing i find interesting about Hassell is his pre/post trade numbers. He was in HighA for San diego, then went right to Wilmington; here was his numbers in both in 2022:
– midland: .299/.379/.467
– Wilmngt: .211/.311/.237 in 10 games.
He immediately gets bumped to AA, probably the plan all along based on his Midland stats… and struggles there with performance and injury for the end of 2022, all of 2023. Finally in 2024 he is doing well in AA: .271/.357/.371. I wish his slugging was higher but those are solid BA and OBP numbers. It just seems like the trade/hamate bone cost him basically a year and a half.
Todd Boss
8 Jan 25 at 12:30 pm
@KW, I yearn to see more Steven Souza stories in our org; guys who struggled and did something that caused things to “click”. There’s way too few of these types among the bats. We’ve actually done a good job with AAA/AAAA reclamation projects like Salazar, Robert Garcia, Hunter Harvey, as well as the general really positive results from a number of prospect SPs this past year (like Susana, Lara, Herz, etc.). You could add Michael Taylor to the list too. Much like Souza, he was bad in his first several seasons in the minors, before things clicked in 2013 (his 4th season).
Too many guys in our org these days are something of a finished product – experience repeated success and rapidly rise the ladder (i.e. Soto, Robles, Turner, Rendon, Wood) – or they start badly and never really figure things out (Drew Mendoza, Sammy Infante, Gage Canning, Rhett Wiseman to name a few of our recent bat busts from the top 5 rounds), or if they do, find success for a short time at an age inappropriate level. If we could figure out a way to fix TJ White, Brenner Cox, Elijah Green or Cristhian Vaquero after their very obvious struggles like Taylor and Souza, it would give me a lot more confidence in the Nats’ player development methods.
Will
8 Jan 25 at 12:40 pm
Todd, Hassell broke his hamate at the AFL in October 2022.
Will
8 Jan 25 at 12:41 pm
@Will; sorry i should have clarified: Hassell’s 2023 season was impacted by the late 2022 Hamate bone injury.
Consensus opinion seems to be 1 year to get back to normal power post hamate bone injury: Giancarlo Stanton probably the most high profile recent example; he broke his June 26th, missed the rest of that year, then his power numbers took a dive the next season. Two seasons on; he hit 59 homers.
so, applying that excuse to Hassell; any dinging of his power for 2023 should be ignored. Predictably, his ISO went from a .133 combined in 2022 to a .101 in 2023. but, we didn’t see the bounceback in 2024 that we’d like: his total milb iso in 2024 was just .088, drug down by an awful .033 figure in AAA.
So we’ll see. AAA on the east coast aren’t hitter’s parks at all.
Todd Boss
8 Jan 25 at 1:35 pm
Because Green’s “loudest” tool is a 44% K rate, which is beyond brutal. His K% went up and his BB% went down. His OBP dropped 30 points. Exit velocity can’t help you when there’s no exit. As notorious as Taylor’s K rates were, he never struck out worse than 29% in the minors. So Green strikes out 50% more often than Taylor at his worst.
The Nats’ big bets in recent years high school picks and international signings seem to be suffering quite a bit because of the contracted minor-league system. Green, Cox, White, Vaquero, Cruz, et al., are all really struggling. In the past they could have had a half year of instructional development and then a half season at the complex or in the NY-Penn League. Now they’re thrown into full-season A-ball at age 18 or 19. You may be facing pitchers who were just with a Power Four collegiate program, miles better than that 130-pound 10th grader who you were taking deep last year.
Admittedly, there are plenty of examples of guys who struggled in the previous system, including some just mentioned: Souza, Taylor, Hood, Ward, and Reetz. High schoolers are risky, no matter the tools.
KW
8 Jan 25 at 1:47 pm
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/01/nationals-sign-amed-rosario-dfa-joan-adon.html
Nats sign Rosario (likely as a Vargas replacement/backup 2B/SS) and DFa’s Adon. For once, I got the “next guy to get DFA’d” right in Adon.
Todd Boss
8 Jan 25 at 2:02 pm
The Rosario signing is a bit head-scratching in that he’s never played 3B and he shares the same split preference as Abrams hitting against LHP. So he’s not a platoon option at SS or a potential bridge at 3B. I doubt that they’re going to move Abrams to 3B, so I’m not sure how all of this works.
I predict that Adon clears waivers and can be outrighted.
KW
8 Jan 25 at 2:09 pm
good pickup in Rosario. if there was any chance of Nunez filling this role you can fuhgeddaboudit
FredMD
8 Jan 25 at 6:23 pm
Agreed that he’s more of a replacement of Nunez (utility MIF) than a 3B solution (at least I hope). I still don’t totally get what the plan is for 3B. Just Tena? Or are they going to give Abrams some reps there?
I’d still rather see what we’ve got in Nunez than waste playing time on Rosario, and I’m not a big fan of Nunez. Since we won’t be competing in 2025 and the season should be spent better understanding what sort of talent we have, and Nunez turns 25 towards the end of this season, he’s no longer a spring chicken. If he’s not ready this year, why do we think he’s going to be ready next? Even if all Nunez is is a utility infielder, that’s fine. We’ll get 5 more years of control of him. But Rosario showed this past season that he doesn’t even have trade value even if he plays well. He was putting up the best offensive season of his career in Tampa, who flipped him to the Dodgers for a total non-prospect in Michael Flynn, a 27 year old reliever with bad stats in his 3rd organization. On top of that, Nunez actually plays good defense, and is genuinely useful in that regard, while Rosario is a bad defensive SS.
Will
8 Jan 25 at 6:48 pm
you’ll learn more about Nunez with him at playing every day in AAA than once a week in MLB
FredMD
8 Jan 25 at 7:02 pm
Exactly — Nunez needs to play every day at AAA. There are going to be a lot of SBs if he and Baker are the double-play combo. If House is at 3B and Morales at 1B, though, where does Lipscomb play? As much as Lipscomb struggled at the MLB level last year, his bat may still turn out to be better than Baker’s or Nunez’s. Wallace would appear to be blocked by House as the moment, unless they play Wallace at 2B.
I have no idea what the 3B plan with the big club is, and neither does anyone else. They had a big discussion of that issue at NatsTalk a few days ago. The one thing that has happened since then is that the Reds have acquired Lux, perhaps making Candy expendable. He hasn’t been great since leaving, but he had success here. The Dodgers also still have a crowded infield and perhaps would part with Miguel Rojas for not very much.
Tena had solid numbers at AAA for Cleveland and didn’t exactly fail in his cameo with the Nats. Perhaps they think he’s good enough for now. With two of the better prospects in the system (House and Wallace) at the position, it doesn’t make a lot of sense to invest heavily and long-term at the position (Bregman). That said, as the clock ticks on Boras, the more likely it becomes that he’ll look for a deal for Bregman with multiple early opt-outs (the usual Boras MO). The Nats would be a good candidate for a landing spot for such a deal . . . except with all of their recent frugal spending, it’s hard to see them coughing up the $25M or so that would be required, even for one season.
I’m in the camp of folks who think that House still needs a good bit of seasoning. Maybe he’s ready for a big league debut by mid-2025, but there’s no guarantee. The Nats really need for him to succeed, in a big way, and if that takes another full season in the minors, that’s what they need to do.
KW
8 Jan 25 at 9:46 pm
Rosario did appear in 15 games at 3B last season, for the first time ever in the majors. I would expect him to get time there in the spring, but only to prep for a reserve role, . . . or the eventuality that Tena really crashes.
The other possibility, outside the box, would be to move Abrams to 3B, which seems quite unlikely blocking House and Wallace, and also raising the power expectations on Abrams. Garcia played a little 3B in the minors in 2018 while yielding to that great SS of the future, Yasel Antuna.
KW
8 Jan 25 at 9:56 pm
I would not be so sure that Baker gets meaningful ABs in Rochester. It seems to me that they already rewarded him for his good service. If another 40 man move is needed he might be DFA’s.
FredMD
8 Jan 25 at 10:01 pm
It will be interesting to see how they handle Wallace and House. It would make most sense for both of them to begin the season where they ended 2024. But what will be interesting is what they’ll do if House starts slowly and Wallace doesn’t.
I’d expect the following to start the season, assuming no major injuries and that Wallace is recovered from whatever kept him out of the AFL:
Rochester: 3B: House, SS: Nunez, 2B: Baker, 1B/UTIL: Lipscomb, DH: Chaparro or Yepez (getting frequent reps at 1B too when Lipscomb gives House his customary regular days off), but you also have Alu and Dunn serving as super utility players in both INF and OF (if either returns)
Harrisburg: 3B: Wallace, SS: Made, 2B: Pena, 1B: Morales, DH: Quintana? Maybe Alu or Dunn would fit here too, UTIL/OF: Glasser.
It works pretty well now, but some tough decisions about playing time will need to be made when promotions start.
Will
9 Jan 25 at 5:35 am
Sorry, forgot to add regarding Tena, it’s not his bat that worries me, it’s the glove at 3B. He committed 10 errors in 35 starts (.889 F%), which isn’t completely unreasonable, given before 2024, he’d only played 20 games at 3B in his career (minors or majors). He’s primarily a SS, and occasionally played 2B. So perhaps on reflection, maybe he’ll serve the UTIL role more so than Rosario?
But it is a bit weird we’ve got like 5 guys who are SS/2B and no one comfortable at 3B.
Will
9 Jan 25 at 5:44 am
FWIW, seven of Tena’s errors at 3B came in the first 19 games so that may show some evidence of improvement.
I think they will open the season with him there and hope that a full spring training of reps will allow him to hold his own until the House/Wallace option comes along.
the fall back is better defense with Lipscomb but a decline in offense.
not the answer someone looking for a solid guarantee of contending in 2025 but it’s not nothing.
FredMD
9 Jan 25 at 9:40 am
@Will – I share the desire to include performance in our evaluations too, and there’s a chance that I’m missing your point, but I’m wondering if you have unrealistic expectations for these prospects, or maybe just unrealistic exceptions for how good the 10th best prospect in the system will be.
KW listed the 2024 AA lines from our 6 of our top bats (and Pinckney) and they’re all above league average and none were old for the level. Additionally, Hassell and Morales both had injuries that may have suppressed their results, and Morales had a 147 wRC+ over 136 PAs after coming back. Lile and especially House are still especially young, and have missed significant development time with injuries. And Crews, House and Hassell all look to be plus defenders.
Are you arguing that their level of performance doesn’t support their consensus rankings?
If you need better performance than that group, your choices are quite limited.
The list of bats in the system w/ an age appropriate 130 wRC+ at their highest minor league level with 50 PAs in 2024 is very short. Wood, Chaparro, Bazzell, Tejada, Tavares, and Angel Feliz. Of those, Wood has graduated and Chaparro is about to. Tejada, Tavares and Feliz are all in rookie ball. And Bazzell’s season was just 60 PAs of low A. Wood aside, I don’t have any of these players ahead of the non-Pinckney prospects from KW’s list. Are these are the bats that should jump in front of Hassell? If not, what additional consideration of performance do you suggest?
SMS
9 Jan 25 at 10:45 am
I will repost with the names attached so it’s easier to digest. These are all exclusively AA numbers from 2024 (Wallace’s from before the trade). They are sorted by wRC+:
Crews: .274 BA, .343 OBP, 125 wRC+, 7.6% BB, 23.7% K, age 22
Wallace: .282 BA, .350 OBP, 120 wRC+, 6.4% BB, 18.6% K, age 22
Morales: .269 BA, .362 OBP, 119 wRC+, 11% BB, 24.5% K, age 22
Hassell: .271 BA, .351 OBP, 113 wRC+, 11% BB, 20.8% K, age 22
House: .234 BA, .310 OBP, 110 wRC+, 7.8% BB, 24.5% K, age 21
Lile: .255 BA, .343 OBP, 108 wRC+, 10.4% BB, 18.4% K, age 21
Pinckney: .259 BA, .328 OBP, 102 wRC+, 7.4% BB, 26.7% K, age 23
I was totally surprised myself when I looked at these numbers in this way. My big takeaway is that we shouldn’t leap to any great conclusions right now about who may not be living up to expectations. The “ranking” really don’t matter that much at this point. The performance going forward will.
KW
9 Jan 25 at 11:08 am
What’s the plan for 3B in 2025? Open competition in spring training between House and Tena. If House blows it out, you start the year with him and Tena is your 2nd backup middle infielder, which would probably mean your infield bench is Rosario, Tena, and Yepez. Move Wallace up to AAA to wait in the wings.
If House isn’t ready, he’s in AAA starting/every day until he is ready, Wallace doesn’t move up, and either Baker/Lipscomb makes the team as the 2nd middle infielder backup.
Todd Boss
9 Jan 25 at 11:57 am
In 54 games at AAA, House posted a meager 66 wRC+, walked only 3% of the time, and K’d 29%. The dude isn’t ready for prime time. In fact, he likely wasn’t ready for AAA (was hitting .234 at AA when socially promoted). I’m not predicting failure for him at all, but it would seem to be malpractice to push him to the majors to start the season, no matter what kind of spring he has. If he wants that MLB per diem, then go to Rochester and tear it up, like Wood did last year.
KW
9 Jan 25 at 12:22 pm
I agree with KW. The earliest we’ll see House is midsummer, and even then only if he produces at least a league average line in AAA.
That means that, unless there’s a big signing or trade between now and opening day, I think the plan is to give the first half of the year to Tena.
I certainly didn’t see enough from him on either side of the ball to be comfortable with that, but maybe the team knows something I don’t.
SMS
9 Jan 25 at 12:32 pm
Agree that House should do another half season at AAA to prove he belongs. I wonder if they’ll promote Wallace and have him split time at another position. the guy’s only 5’11” … why is he limited to 3B? His freshman year at Arkansas he played almost exclusively Right Field. So, he’s got positional flexibility. A guy who can play RF can also play LF. A guy who can play 3B can also play 2B.
I’ll bet House stays at 3B, Wallace comes up and does some Baker-esque position splitting between 2B/3B/and and outfield spot.
Todd Boss
9 Jan 25 at 2:21 pm
If the team wants to buy a 1yr FA 3B … there’s a couple big names still on the market that fit the bill of “rental veteran trying to rebuild value”
https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/league-info/free-agent-position-players/
– Yoan Moncada seems like he was hurt all year but has never had a negative bWAR season
– You could probably get Mike Moustakas and Brandon Drury on MLFA/NRI deals
Obviously the big name remaining is Bregman, but he’d be crazy to take a one year/pillow contract.
Todd Boss
9 Jan 25 at 2:27 pm
Assuming (not my preference FWIW) that the Nats do not acquire a full-time 3b (whether by trade or FA), then I would not be surprised to see Tena and Rosario platoon at 3b, Tena vs RHP and Rosario vs. LHP.
Since at the moment the entire Nats infield (Lowe; Garcia; Abrams; Tena) bats LH, Rosario would likely start pretty much every game vs. a LHP subbing in for anyone but Lowe (who doesn’t have severe platoon splits or could get subbed by Yepez or Chaparro, whoever wins the backup 1b/DH/bench bat competition in ST) even if they don’t do a straight up platoon at 3b. Frankly I’d prefer giving Abrams and Garcia more ABs vs. LHP because they project as regulars and you want them to be able to hit lefties at need.
John C.
9 Jan 25 at 3:21 pm
I usually don’t set great store in Steamer projections, but just for the heck of it:
Tena: .252/.298/.386, wRC+ 91
Moncada: .239/.309/.376, wRC+ 94
Drury: .234/.291/.388, wRC+ 94
Moustakas: .220/.279/.352, wRC+ 77 (ouch)
Lipscomb: .245/.292/.347, wRC+ 79 (better than Moose)
House: .226/.271/.361, wRC+ 76
Rosario: .265/.302/.380, wRC+ 90
Bregman: .261/.344/.442, wRC+ 122
My general takeaway here is that betting on Tena is probably just as good as any of the other (suspect) options.
KW
9 Jan 25 at 5:27 pm
Or, more likely, the Tena/Rosario platoon:
Tena v. RHP in ’24: .292/.333/.398
Rosario v. LHP ’24: .294/.325/.412
KW
9 Jan 25 at 5:33 pm
My preference is just to sign Bregman up to ~$200M/7. Our payroll is rock bottom, and it’s set up to stay very manageable through 2029 at least, so I don’t think we have to be so precious about every single dollar.
If that deal doesn’t work, on our side or on his, I’d try to swing a trade. I’d call the Twins and offer Parker and House and their choice of a couple of our superfluous OFers for Royce Lewis. I’d reach out and see what Arenado wants to OK moving to DC. Etc.
If none of that is possible, I suppose I agree that the Tena/Rosario platoon may well be the least bad available option. But that tandem played 50 games at 3B to a combined 0.2 WAR last year, so I can’t really get around to the idea that it’s an affirmatively good option.
SMS
9 Jan 25 at 6:21 pm
With trash cans, Bregman posted fWAR of 4.7/7.9/8.3. For the last three years, it’s been 5.4/4.5/4.1. Much of that WAR in two of the three seasons has been from defense. Most distressingly, his career .366 OPS plunged last season to .319, and his walk percentage basically dropped in half. He still hardly strikes out. His hard contact has fallen a hair. He’ll turn 31 at the end of March. Seven years is a LONG time, all the more for someone who already seems to be in early decline.
On the unlikely assumption that the current uber-frugal Nats would pay at least $25M AAV for Bregman, it still only makes sense for them if there’s an opt out after one or two seasons. One of their best prospects plays 3B, as does a medium-level prospect in Wallace, and the current consensus 1/1 pick (a high schooler, but one who certainly would be MLB-ready before a seven-year contract is done). Tena also could be considered a medium-level prospect.
The House/Wallace/Holliday situation also makes it unlikely that the Nats would invest much capital in a major trade. I would think that a Bregman pillow contract would be more likely than a big trade, but I still don’t think it’s very likely.
As much of a shrug as it elicits, I think Rosario is their 3B acquisition for the year. Admittedly, “he’s better than Senzel” is quite a low bar.
KW
9 Jan 25 at 10:34 pm
I don’t want derail the present conversation, @SMS, my problem lies with the inconsistency. Morales posted a 156 wRC+ in 2023, and then a 129 wRC+ across 2024 (which is adjusted to each level). Between when he was drafted and to the present day, he was downgraded from a 50 hit tool to 45 by MLB Pipeline and down to 30/35 by FanGraphs. Weird for a guy hitting so high above average. Meanwhile, Hassell posted a 85 and 87 wRC+ in the same period, and went from a 50 hit tool (to start ’23) by MLB to a 50 hit tool (in their mid/end season update in ’24), and 40/45 from FG to a… 40/45 from 2023 to mid 2024. I don’t understand why some guys have their scouting potential grades dropped rather quickly (i.e. Morales), while other can go for years of poor performance and see no effect on their potential (i.e. Hassell). Elijah Green has genuinely plummeted from being a top 50 overall prospect to #15 in the Nats org after 2 bad seasons. Whereas, Yasel Antuna still sat at #8 on Prospects1500’s 2022 list of our org, despite having over 3 consecutive seasons of poor performance. Andy Acevedo was a highly rated IFA in 2023 and is nowhere to be seen on this list after 2 seasons of poor performance. Armando Cruz was a highly rated IFA in 2021, and yet is still #32 after some genuinely horrible performances. It doesn’t make sense to me why some players’ potentials get quickly cut down due to bad performance, while others can go on failing for years before it gets reflected in their scouting reports. That’s all. But happy to move on to discussing other topics!
On 3B, it’s indeed bleak, if only because the 2026 free agent pool is even bleaker than this season’s. 34 year old Eugenio Suarez (the star of the bunch, but if you think Bregman at 31 is a bad investment…), Gio Urshela (worth 1.2 fWAR total from 2023-2024), Miguel Andujar (worth 0.7 WAR from 2023-24), and that’s it. So we will genuinely need House or Wallace to make some serious progress this season.
However, Ha Seong Kim is still unsigned. It seems his shoulder injury might be more serious than it seemed. But he’s 29 and has been good for 3-4 WAR in his short career.
There’s also the future possibility to move Abrams to 3B and hopefully work around his defensive frailties at SS, which would open up other free agent possibilities, like Bo Bichette and Tommy Edman (who could also probably play 3B if needed).
I also hold out a bit of optimism for Tena. If he can fix his defensive woes at 3B, and perhaps having a steady glove at 1B in Lowe will help that process, then there’s some upside there. He’s remarkably only 4 months older than Cayden Wallace, and his numbers in the minors have also been better than Wallace’s, so I think we’re overlooking his projectability quite a bit. Tena:
2022, age 21 AA-AAA, 95 wRC+
2023, age 22, AA-AAA, 112 wRC+
2024, age 23, AAA, 113 wRC+
Compared to Wallace being a year or two behind Tena developmentally:
2022, age 20, ACL-A, 134 wRC+
2023, age 21, A+-AA, 106 wRC+
2024, age 22, A+-AA, 95 wRC+
But otherwise, they’re actually very similar profile players. Tena strikes out a bit more, but they’ve displayed similar power, middling speed, middling on base skills. FanGraphs rates them both as 40+ FVs.
But Tena is going to need to make big strides, because his 80 wRC+ through 60 MLB games so far isn’t good enough.
Will
10 Jan 25 at 5:34 am
I’ll put this out there: I do not want Bregman. For a myriad of reasons already touched on here:
– 3 year downward trend of offensive stats
– 7yr $200M for his age 31-38 seasons? No thanks. That contract would immediately rival Anthony Rendon’s as “worst in the league”
– I’m Especially concerned about what’s happening to his batting eye: his OBP last year was just .315 and his walks ahve been cut in half in two years.
– character issues as being part of that Houston cheating culture
– clubhouse presence issues in general; he’s clearly a leader of this Houston clubhouse; how will he integrate into a new spot?
– great defender now of course, but too much of his value depends on Defense that will erode over time.
– lastly, the Immediate blocking our #2 prospect. I don’t care if you’re pro or con House; the facts are simple: he’s in AAA at age 21, he was our big-bonus draft guy just a couple years ago, he’s our #2 overall prospect, and he hasn’t played anything except 3B for basically 3 seasons. This is precisely the kind of player you do NOT block with a $30m/year veteran signing. If House was age 25 and putting these numbers up in AAA with just one option year remaining, sure. But that’s not what House is; he’s top 50 of the entire minor league-level prospect talent who you save room for.
Todd Boss
10 Jan 25 at 9:42 am
Re Bregman – I understand and agree with a lot of the objections. I even remember replying to a comment on here, or maybe on Harper’s or Luke’s blog, that “I don’t want Bregman, but agree with the rest of [someone’s] FA suggestions.” The age decile risks are very real, though 7 years only runs through age 37 not 38.
But in the months since then the players I preferred have come off the board and Bregman is the only player remaining that would significantly move the needle for this team. I’d much rather the team expect 85 wins at the price of $1.75M each than 80 wins at $1.5M per. Efficiency is a means, not an end in itself.
Specifically on the character questions, I 100% agree that is a hurdle that could nix the deal but I trust Rizzo to make good decisions about that kind of thing. It’s worth noting that Bregman was just a kid on those cheating teams. If I were in Rizzo’s shoes, there are certainly versions of that story where he takes responsibility and shows growth that I would not find disqualifying.
I’m also not worried about blocking House or Wallace. FV50 and FV45 prospects fail – as in aren’t better than replacement level – all the time. And a borderline star player (~3 WAR/yr) is like the 85th percentile future for House and probably the 95th percentile for Wallace. Maybe you can worry about blocking FV60s, but outside that small handful of guys, I think you should just make your team the best you can and figure out how to get value for surplus assets later, should the team actually have any.
And I don’t care one iota about the ordinal ranking – House is our #2 and soon to be our #1 prospect, and I don’t think I’m down on him, but I don’t think it’s worth wasting 1-2 years of this team’s potential waiting to see what he can become.
All that said, I think it’s unlikely the team will sign Bregman. I suspect they’re trying to keep the budget as low as possible and “blocking House” is exactly the kind of partially true concern that gives the team cover.
SMS
10 Jan 25 at 11:11 am
@Will – I also don’t want to derail the 3B conversation but I do think this is an interesting point, so I wanted to continue the other discussion in parallel.
I certainly agree that there’s inconsistency, but I’m not sure it’s a problem. There should be inconsistency because the scouts are trying to add in layers of information that aren’t contained in the statlines. If every player who put together XYZ results at a certain age and level got the same scouting report, the scouting report would be meaningless.
I also think it’s less glaring that you present it. Morales got dropped hard by FG and somewhat by Pipeline, but he’s 6th in the ranking at the top of the page. Green plummeted and Antuna didn’t at very different times for our farm system. Look at the names behind Antuna on the 2022 list – how many of them would make our top 30 now? Hell, Cronin was ranked 13th! I don’t want to reopen that conversation, but I think we can all agree that a system with a reliever ranked that high is in terrible shape. I think it’s important not to get caught up in the ordinal rankings and assume that Green is being treated so much more harshly than Antuna. As far as Cruz – he’s not in my top 50, so obviously I don’t agree with his placement on this list, but a plus SS glove is a hell of a carrying tool and it’s hard to get that upset about him still ranking in the 30s. Acevedo, I believe, is supposed to be more of a “can play short” defender. Which is just to say that there are often plausible explanations for these and other inconsistencies, and we (ie obsessed fans) are best served by trying to understand the underlying judgements and theories of the case even when we don’t agree.
None of this is to deny that everyone gets lazy sometimes, and YoY inertia in these rankings is a real bias that we need to watch out for. We don’t have give anyone the benefit of the doubt and, for any specific name, it’s hard to tell if they’ve got a good reason to look past immediate results. But in aggregate, I’m sure folks are just trying their best. Predicting the future is a hard job.
SMS
10 Jan 25 at 11:58 am
Look, I get the objections to Bregman just because he’s got a bit of “jerk” edge to him. It’s not for nothing that I refer to him as having a #punchableface. But the simple writing off of his peak years in 2018 and 2019 as being “trash can” inflated runs into some real timeline problems. 2017 was the heyday of the Banging Scheme, and yet Bregman’s road splits that season were better than his home splits. According to the MLB investigation the Astros had stopped cheating in mid-2018 because it wasn’t effective (see, e.g., Bregman’s H/R splits in 2017). And even you assume they continued the scheme into 2019 – Bregman’s career year – you again run into the fact that his road splits in 2019 were better than his home splits. How can that be, if his numbers were a product of cheating?
Much more likely to me is that Bregman’s peak was a product of his coming into his game at age 25 along with the rabbit ball that year. The rabbit ball didn’t help the true sluggers (Judge; Stanton; Schwarber; Harper; etc.) because they didn’t need the help. It was the second tier/doubles power guys (like Bregman and Rendon) who really gained from the extra 10-15′ the rabbit ball provided. It turned a bunch of those doubles into HRs.
As for Bregman being a cultural influencer in the Astros’ clubhouse pushing the team towards cheating, well, I don’t know about that. The season of the cheating – 2017 – was only Bregman’s second with the team and was his first full season (he played in 49 games in 2016). I’d be pretty surprised if a 23yo kid in his first full season in The Show carried a lot of weight in a clubhouse full of veterans like Beltran, McCann, Gurriel, and Springer. It would have taken a LOT Of courage to speak up against the prevailing culture as a newbie.
John C.
10 Jan 25 at 12:46 pm
I’m interested to see if there’s any trash backlash for Beltran on the HOF vote.
Yeah, I had looked at Bregman’s career splits at some point this winter and was really surprised to see that he’s been slightly better on the road than at home. I thought he had made a living off the Crawford Boxes.
My biggest concern about Bregman came from Keith Law, who basically said that he’s a dead-red fastball hitter who suddenly is having trouble catching up with fastballs. There’s no cure for that, and it won’t age well.
I would love to have Bregman for the Nats, but only for a couple years. Beyond that, the deal doesn’t make any sense. I seriously doubt that it’s going to happen, but Rizzo has helped Boras pull a rabbit out of a hat a few times before, so never say never. But I’ve never been in the “sure, sign him for seven years” camp.
KW
10 Jan 25 at 7:30 pm
I think a lot of folks are irrationally scared of having an overpriced 1 WAR player on the roster on the tail end of these long term deals.
For one thing, I don’t believe money saved by the team is reinvested back into it, either on the field or in the fan experience. I believe that whatever budget supported by the revenues and the Lerners’ preferences, any savings below that number just accrue to their bottom line and the next year starts anew.
With a nod to John C, I admit that I don’t know this for a fact, but I have a hard time understanding the psychology of a billionaire who is money-driven enough to require their baseball team to turn a profit but not money-driven enough to take a temporary extra windfall. At a minimum, we can say there is no evidence that the Lerners would reinvest money saved into future teams.
So, to me, the efficiency of a potential signing deal is really beside the point until it crowds out other signings. Bregman would make the team better, and the total payroll would still be plenty low. I don’t care how big the Lerners’ profit is, so I don’t see the downside. (That’s all assuming the team believes he’ll have a -0.5WAR/yr aging curve or something. If they agree with KW and Law and think Bregman will collapse faster than a typical player, then I agree you pass.)
Also, @KW, you prefer a short term deal for Bregman. What offer would you make? Everyone knows that the expected value from the player would be heavily frontloaded, so it would need to be $100M/2 or $130M/3 or something to have any chance of getting it done. Maybe you can get away with smaller guarantees if you include opt-outs, but then the player captures the potential upside and the team can’t plan its roster even one year in advance (which makes it harder to House etc). I’d rather just commit the money and take our chances.
SMS
11 Jan 25 at 11:26 am
not a lot of buzz on the Lopez signing but he is a solid bullpen option.
keep ’em coming!
FredMD
12 Jan 25 at 10:13 am
I’ve been saying for several weeks that the real hay still left to be made is with bullpen additions. Lopez is a nice addition. Get three more guys like that and it may be worth five wins across the season. I see that the Braves backed off of Jeff Hoffman because of medical concerns, though.
It is weird that the Nats have full 40-man but only half a bullpen and no closer. They DFA’d Willingham to add Lopez.
@SMS, all Bregman is worth to the Nats, by my thinking, is something like 1/$25M. I’ve no interest in giving him big money, even short term, just a pillow. Per MLBTR, the word has been put out that Santander and Flaherty are willing to consider short-term contracts, and Bregman might be joining that list soon.
KW
14 Jan 25 at 1:17 pm
For those interested in the Hall of Fame and who have an Athletic and/or NYT subscription, this is an interesting read, with the Athletic writers who are Hall voters sharing their ballots and their reasoning:
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6059101/2025/01/14/baseball-hall-of-fame-ballots-2025/
I’m surprised at how many have six to ten names on their ballots.
KW
15 Jan 25 at 11:53 am