Here’s my annual Nationals All Star selection post.
(* == All-Star game starter. The Nats now have three ASG starters in their history, dating to 2005).
- Nationals All-Star representatives: Bryce Harper*, Max Scherzer
- Possible Snubs: Yunel Escobar, Drew Storen
- Narrative: Harper not only made it in as a starter for the 2nd time, he led the NL in votes, setting a MLB record for total votes received. This is no surprise; Harper’s easily in the MVP lead for the NL thanks to his amazing first half (his split at the half-way point of the season: .347/.474/.722 with 25 homers and an astounding 225 OPS+). I guess he won’t be earning the “Most overrated player” award next year. That Harper is electing to skip the Home run derby in a disappointment; his father is nursing an arm injury can cannot throw to him in the event. In a weird year for the Nats, the only other regular worth mentioning is newly acquired Escobar, who is hitting above .300 and filling in ably at multiple positions that, prior to this year, he had never played. Storen is having another excellent regular season … but at a time when mandatory members from each team often leads to other closers being selected (there are 5 NL closers and 7 AL relievers), the odds of him making the All-Star team were always going to be slim. Scherzer deservedly makes the team and probably would have been the NL starter; he’s got sub 2.00 ERA and FIP and leads all NL pitchers in WAR at the mid-way point of the season. But his turn came up in the final game of the first half, making him ineligible for the game and forcing his replacement on the roster.
As a side note, the 2015 All-Star game will go down as the “Ballot-Gate” game thanks to MLB’s short-sighted plan to allow 30+ online ballots per email address. This led to severe “ballot stuffing” by the Kansas City Royals fans, led to MLB having to eliminate 60 million+ fraudulent ballots, but still led to several Royals being elected starters over more deserving candidates.
Here’s past year’s information, mostly recycled information from past posts on the topic but fun to read nonetheless, especially the early years.
- Nationals All-Star representative: Jordan Zimmermann (Update post-publishing: Zimmermann strained a bicep, and had to withdraw from the ASG. For a bit it looked like the Nats wouldn’t even have a representative, until Tyler Clippard was named on 7/13/14).
- Possible Snubs: Adam LaRoche, Anthony Rendon, Rafael Soriano, Drew Storen
- Narrative: Zimmermann’s been the best SP on the best pitching staff in the majors this year, and thus earns his spot. I find it somewhat odd that a first place team (or near to it) gets just one representative on the team (as discussed above). Rendon tried to make the team via the “last man in” voting, but historically Nationals have not fared well in this competition (especially when better known players from large markets are in the competition, aka Anthony Rizzo from the Chicago Cubs), and indeed Rendon finished 4th in the last-man voting. LaRoche is having a very good season, almost single handedly carrying the Nats offense while major parts were out injured, but he’s never going to beat out the slew of great NL first basemen (Joey Votto couldn’t even get into this game). Soriano has quietly put together one of the best seasons of any closer in the game; at the time of this writing he has a 1.03 ERA and a .829 whip; those are Dennis Eckersley numbers. But, the farce that is the all-star game selection criteria (having to select one player from each team) means that teams need a representative, and deserving guys like Soriano get squeezed. Then, Soriano indignantly said he wouldn’t even go if named as a replacement … likely leading to Clippard’s replacement selection. The same goes for non-closer Storen, who sports a sub 2.00 ERA on the year. Advanced stats columnists (Keith Law) also think that Stephen Strasburg is a snub but I’m not entirely sure: he may lead the NL in K’s right now and have far better advanced numbers than “traditional,” but its hard to make an argument that a guy with a 7-6 record and a 3.50+ ERA is all-star worthy.
- Nationals All-Star representatives: Bryce Harper*, Jordan Zimmermann
- Snubs: Stephen Strasburg, Ian Desmond
- Narrative: Harper comes in 3rd in the NL outfielder voting, ahead of some big-time names, to become only the second Nationals position player elected as an All-Star starter. He was 4th in the final pre-selection vote, so a big last minute push got him the starter spot. Harper also becomes the first National to participate in the Home Run Derby. Zimmermann was 12-3 heading into the game and was on mid-season Cy Young short lists in July in a breakout season. Strasburg’s advanced stats are all better than Zimmermann’s, but his W/L record (4-6 as the ASG) means he’s not an all-star. It also probably doesn’t help that he missed a few weeks. Desmond loses out to Troy Tulowitzki, Everth Cabrera and Jean Segura. Tulowitzki was having a very solid year and was a deserving elected starter, while Cabrera and Segura are both having breakout seasons. Desmond was on the “Final vote” roster, but my vote (and most others’ I’m guessing) would be for Yasiel Puig there ([Editor Update: Desmond and Puig lost out to Freddie Freeman: I still wished that Puig finds a way onto the roster but ultimately he did not and I believe the ASG was diminished because of it). Gio Gonzalez, Ryan Zimmerman, and Rafael Soriano are all having solid but unspectacular years and miss out behind those having great seasons.
- Nationals All-Star representatives: Stephen Strasburg, Gio Gonzalez, Ian Desmond, Bryce Harper
- Possible Snubs: Adam LaRoche, Craig Stammen
- Narrative: The two SPs Strasburg and Gonzalez were the obvious candidates, and my personal prediction was that they’d be the only two candidates selected. Gonzalez’ first half was a prelude to his 21-win, 3rd place Cy Young season. The inclusion of Desmond is a surprise, but also a testament to how far he’s come as a player in 2012. Harper was a last-minute injury replacement, but had earned his spot by virtue of his fast start as one of the youngest players in the league. Of the “snubs,” LaRoche has had a fantastic come back season in 2012 but fared little shot against better, more well-known NL first basemen. Stammen was our best bullpen arm, but like LaRoche fared little chance of getting selected during a year when the Nats had two deserving pitchers selected.
- Nationals All-Star representatives: Tyler Clippard
- Possible Snubs: Danny Espinosa, Michael Morse, Drew Storen, Jordan Zimmermann
- Narrative: While Clippard was (arguably) the Nats best and most important reliever, I think Zimmermann was a more rightful choice. He was 10th in the league in ERA at the time of the selections and has put in a series of dominant performances. Meanwhile Espinosa was on pace for a 28-homer season and almost a certain Rookie-of-the-Year award (though a precipitous fall-off in the 2nd half cost him any realistic shot at the ROY), and perhaps both players are just too young to be known around the league. Lastly Morse is certainly known and he merited a spot in the “last man in” vote sponsored by MLB (though he fared little chance against popular players in this last-man-in voting).
- Nationals All-Star representatives: Matt Capps
- Possible Snubs: Adam Dunn, Josh Willingham, Ryan Zimmerman, Steven Strasburg
- Narrative: Capps was clearly deserving, having a breakout season as a closer after his off-season non-tender from the Pirates. The 3-4-5 hitters Zimmerman-Dunn-Willingham all had dominant offensive seasons as the team improved markedly from its 103-loss season. But perhaps the surprise non-inclusion was Strasburg, who despite only having a few starts as of the all-star break was already the talk of baseball. I think MLB missed a great PR opportunity to name him to the team to give him the exposure that the rest of the national media expected. But in the end, Capps was a deserving candidate and I can’t argue that our hitters did anything special enough to merit inclusion.
- Nationals All-Star representatives: Ryan Zimmerman
- Possible Snubs: Adam Dunn
- Narrative: The addition of Dunn and Willingham to the lineup gave Zimmerman the protection he never had, and he produced with his career-best season. His first and deserved all-star appearance en-route to a 33 homer season. Dunn continued his monster homer totals with little all-star recognition.
- Nationals All-Star representatives: Cristian Guzman
- Possible Snubs: Jon Rauch
- Narrative: The first of two “hitting rock-bottom” seasons for the team; no one really merited selection. Zimmerman was coming off of hamate-bone surgery in November 2007 and the team was more or less awful across the board. Rauch performed ably after Cordero went down with season-ending (and basically career-ending) shoulder surgery. Guzman’s selection a great example of why one-per-team rules don’t make any sense. Guzman ended up playing far longer than he deserved in the game itself by virtue of the 15-inning affair.
- Nationals All-Star representatives: Dmitri Young
- Possible Snubs: Ryan Zimmerman, Shawn Hill (though I wouldn’t argue for either)
- Narrative: Young gets a deserved all-star appearance en route to comeback player of the year. Zimmerman played a full season but didn’t dominate. Our 2007 staff gave starts to 13 different players, most of whom were out of the league within the next year or two. Not a good team.
- Nationals All-Star representatives: Alfonso Soriano*
- Possible Snubs: Nick Johnson, Ryan Zimmerman, Chad Cordero
- Narrative: Soriano made the team as an elected starter, the first time the Nats have had such an honor. Our pitching staff took massive steps backwards and no starter came even close to meriting a spot. Cordero was good but not lights out as he had been in 2005. Soriano’s 40-40 season is a poster child for “contract year” production and he has failed to come close to such production since. The team was poor and getting worse. Johnson had a career year but got overshadowed by bigger, better first basemen in the league (a recurring theme for our first basemen over the years).
- Nationals All-Star representatives: Livan Hernandez, Chad Cordero
- Possible Snubs: Nick Johnson, John Patterson.
- Narrative: The Nats went into the All Star break surprisingly in first place, having run to a 50-31 record by the halfway point. Should a first place team have gotten more than just two representatives? Perhaps. But the team was filled with non-stars and played far over its head to go 50-31 (as evidenced by the reverse 31-50 record the rest of the way).
Nice writeup; a fun annual trip down memory lane. One thing that could keep Scherzer from starting: if the Nats decide to start him on Sunday in Baltimore that would likely keep him from appearing in the ASG.
John C.
8 Jul 15 at 8:46 am
Good point; he is scheduled to start since they have a day off and will skip Roark/Jordan/flavor of the week starting in place of Strasburg.
He *should* be the NL starter. 🙂
Todd Boss
8 Jul 15 at 9:17 am
I meant to write in an editorial comment in; i’ll put it here instaed for discussion. Thanks to the whole “it means something” ridiculousness, we’re now seeing the managers take closers instead of deserving starters since closers make more sense to bring in and pitch an inning later on. There’s 5 relievers on the NL squad, 7 relievers on the AL squad, yet pitchers like Kershaw, Cueto, Martinez, Arrietta, Hamels, etc are left off the roster.
This is further distortion of the point of an all-star game in my opinion. Look at the NBA: they pick the 12 best players in each league, period. And they play an exhibition game. How hard is it to do that in the MLB?
Todd Boss
8 Jul 15 at 9:22 am
I really disagree with your editorial comment. I never watch the NBA or NFL all-star games as they are a joke with no defense and not any kind of representative play. I’d rather have a “real” game with players trying to win, even it it means that managers pass over a few deserving players to select someone with more specific (or perhaps broader .. e.g., Brock Holt) skills.
DaveB
8 Jul 15 at 12:08 pm
I can’t remember the last time I’ve watched much of an all-star game of any sport. Baseball’s has gotten almost silly with the huge rosters and very little playing time for anyone. The WS home-field wrinkle is yet another idiotic Selig legacy. Home field belongs to the team with the better record in every other sport.
As for Scherzer, unless he’s the NL starter, he should take his rotation turn on Sunday. Let him have the honor if he’s the starter, but if not, the regular-season start is more important. He looked a bit tired last night, though, so it might not hurt him to miss Sunday and have a few easy innings in Cincy.
Think Kershaw might be a little fired up the next few times he faces Bochy? Not smart, Bruce!
KW
8 Jul 15 at 12:25 pm
But Dave, do you have a “real” game right now? Of course not. You have starters elected by a process so flawed that the league had to invalidate 65million votes. You have a mandatory selection of a player from every team instead of picking the best 20 players from each league. You have players selected by virtue of a 2 month hot streak as opposed to talent. You have managers picking closers instead of starters. You have starters who get taken out after a couple of ABs. You have managers trying to get everybody a plate appearance. That’s not a real game. That’s an exhibition.
I think it is patently ridiculous (as does practically every other baseball pundit out there) that home field advantage in the league final comes down to anything other than performance on the field by the two teams involved.
Todd Boss
8 Jul 15 at 12:52 pm
Todd, I can’t believe no one else has welcomed you back!
Mark L
8 Jul 15 at 2:04 pm
haha. Yeah I guess it was a good 10 days between posts. What can I say, after colleges ended I had little to write about. I do have some other stuff i could put in, stuff about travel teams in the area and a starter for some 2016 local draft prospects…
Todd Boss
8 Jul 15 at 2:57 pm
Perhaps you could do a Nats mid-season review. It’s been a weird year with the injury apocalypse and Desi completely wandering in the wilderness, yet the team still looks pretty solid in the division and close to a 90-win pace.
I think you have generally done a minor-league arms review at some point as well. There’s been some progress and promotion on that front just this week.
KW
9 Jul 15 at 5:16 am
KW: good idea, you inspired me. new posted.
Todd Boss
9 Jul 15 at 11:49 am