Nationals Arm Race

"… the reason you win or lose is darn near always the same – pitching.” — Earl Weaver

So, Is that all we could get for MacKenzie Gore??

3 comments

So Long Gore. Photo wikipedia

It’s been rumored all off-season, and now a few weeks before Pitchers and Catchers report, our biggest trade asset MacKenzie Gore has been traded. Announced last night, the Nats moved Gore to Texas for a package of 5 prospects.

Here’s a quick look at those 5 prospects, with their new Nats system rank and other pertinent information:

  • shortstop Gavin Fien; 2025 1st rounder, Age 18. Our new #5 prospect (was Texas’ #2 prospect)
  • right-hander Alejandro Rosario; 2023 college 5th rounder, Age 24, AA last year, new #11 prospect
  • infielder Devin Fitz-Gerald: 2025 prep 5th rounder but over-slot bonus, age 20, new #12 prospect
  • outfielder Yeremy Cabrera: 2022 IFA, just 20, our new #17 prospect
  • first baseman/outfielder Abimelec Ortiz; 2021 NDFA, Age 3, on 40-man, hit AAA last year, new #24

First glance? I’m sorry, but is this all we could get? One 18yr old 1st rounder, two 20yr olds in low-A, a AA starter who missed all of 2025 AND just had TJ so he’s missing all of 2026 too, and a AAA utility guy? This is a major swing from a risk perspective, and the lack of additional higher-regarded prospects give me pause. The discovery (post publishing) that the 2nd best prospect is out for the entire 2026 season is even more demoralizing here.

I’m really disappointed with this return. We didn’t even get Texas’ best prospect in this deal. Maybe that’s me overvaluing Gore. On the one hand, Gore’s career numbers put him at a 98 ERA+. But at the same time, we’ve seen him be completely dominant for stretches. He’s valuable because he’s being paid a pittance for what he provides as a mid-rotation starter ($2.8M in first year Arb this year, $5.6M this year) and for 2 more years of control. He’s an innings eater who throws mid-90s from the left side; that’s worth a ton of the FA market and should have been worth more in trade.

When he didn’t go in the Winter Meetings, I thought the team should hold on to him until the Trade Deadline, when desperate teams who had lost starters to injury would be overpaying for mid-level starters. I was wrong; the new FO pulled the trigger on a deal they liked. I sense this was an underpay by Texas, but clearly the GM sees these younger guys and liked the deal.

An additional wrinkle: we’ve spoken before about the logjam of young shortstops projected to play in Fredericksburg in 2026 … well we just added two more guys who need playing time. We now add Fien and Fitz-Gerald to Willis, Feliz, Dickerson, and Mota, all of whom are likely projected to Low-A and who predominantly play SS.

What does this mean for the franchise? Insiders and those in the knew already knew this, but the signals have been strong that we’re on our way to bottoming out once again. My “casual Nats fan” pinged me last night with an immediate reaction to this trade, asking why we were getting rid of our best pitcher and I had to break it to him; we’re going to be bad for a while, so buckle up. This latter type of fan is the one who the Nats eventually will need to come back, to buy tickets, to bring the family for weekend games … but I sense a move like this, one which gets rid of one of the few players whose names they even know, is going to turn people off for a while.

I’m always excited to get more prospects into the system, as a prospect-heavy analysis site. Don’t get me wrong; can’t wait to do the spreadsheet work and try to noodle where I think these players will fit in my eventual top-100+ ranking that i’ll publish before the season starts. But I hate trading away assets and not getting enough in return, which I believe happened here.


What do you think? Am I over-valuing Gore? Did we get appropriate return here? Should we have waited til the Trade deadline 2026?

Written by Todd Boss

January 23rd, 2026 at 10:43 am

3 Responses to 'So, Is that all we could get for MacKenzie Gore??'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'So, Is that all we could get for MacKenzie Gore??'.

  1. The general consensus on the InterNats is (of course) that the Nats sold low, are incompetent, etc., etc.. The industry consensus that I’ve seen so far varies from solid return/Toboni held out for his price and the Rangers came around (Longenhagen at FG) to thinking that the Rangers paid too much (Steve Phillips on MLB Radio). His take is because he has concerns about Gore.

    I expect industry takes to be dismissed unless they conclude that Nats “lost” the trade.

    Me? I hope that it works. I don’t think that I have the scouting acumen to feel like a second guess from me would be worth much.

    John C.

    23 Jan 26 at 1:39 pm

  2. Although I think that it’s absolutely fair to say that the targeted return (and Toboni’s comments after the trade) remove any lingering doubt about the contention window being pushed back.

    John C.

    23 Jan 26 at 1:43 pm

  3. I don’t like that the 2nd best player in the deal just had TJ a couple weeks ago. I don’t like that the leading player is an 18yr old, no matter how good he was for U18 Team USA. That really colors the deal for me.

    Todd Boss

    23 Jan 26 at 2:10 pm

Leave a Reply