Here’s Tom Boswell’s weekly Monday chat from 3/5/12. Of the baseball questions he took, here’s how I’d have answered them. While lots of questions pertained to the recent Gregg Williams “bounty” issues and whether or not the Redskins partook during his time here, the starting of spring training has got Nats fans pretty excited.
As always, questions are edited for clarity and I write my own answer prior to reading his.
Q: What do you think the Nats w/l record will be? Can they win 90 games?
A: For a team that won 80 last year (though their pythagorean W/L record was slightly worse), I don’t think its a stretch to assume they can improve another 10 games. Mark Zuckerman did a nice little WAR analysis and showed that full seasons from Zimmerman, LaRoche and Strasburg, along with the new additions of Gonzalez and Jackson *should* give the team at least another 10 wins, perhaps a bit more. That’s assuming basically that everyone else performs at the same levels they did last year, and it assumes that the WAR stat directly translates to wins on the field. In reality, you have to plan for some people to step up while others step back. Can we assume that Morse will hit 30 homers again? Its a tough one to assume; he could break a leg and suddenly our offense is in tatters.
That’s why I’ve been a bit more conservative, predicting 8 more wins for this team and have them at 88-74 with this squad. If the team is in the WC hunt, and they augment the offense, or if Harper comes up and produces … suddenly that’s a 90-91 win team. Boswell didn’t really answer this question, just went off on Strasburg tangents.
Q: Who is your opening day starter?
A: barring injury it has to be Strasburg. I think your initial 5-man rotation goes like this, in this order: Strasburg, Gonzalez, Zimmermann, Jackson and Wang. This gives you a decent righty-lefty matchup at the top. Perhaps you replace Wang with Lannan and have Jackson go out 5th to get a true R-L-R-L-R rotation. Or perhaps Davey Johnson doesn’t care about lefty/righty matchups. I’m more interested to see who the home opener starter is, since it happens 7 games into the season. Right now it looks to be Gonzalez, which would be great, but early season rain-outs can greatly affect rotation orders. Boswell says Strasburg but had a good caveat; if its 30 degrees and snowing in Chicago on opening day Strasburg probably won’t go.
Q: Where is this team’s Lenny Dykstra-esque scrappy mean streak player?
A: Honestly, the Mets-to-Nats comparisons may not ever bee 100%. I don’t see a Dykstra type on this roster. Mostly because this roster still does not have a center fielder/lead off type, which is exactly what Dykstra was. Boswell says that Werth may still fill this role.
Q: Why didn’t the team keep Bixler and Nix?
A: Bixler is a good question; for reasons unknown the team designated him for assignment in the off-season while still possessing 40-man room (inexplicably; they did this a number of times, losing Kimball at one point but also losing two decent players in the Rule 5 draft). Nix they probably thought was replaceable on the FA market … or at least obtainable for cheap. There does always seem to be a number of halfway decent corner outfielders on the market who are available for less than what Nix got. Boswell says Nix’s 2yr contract was the problem … the Nats want flexibility for 2014. No mention of Bixler.
Q: If Tyler Clippard is our “MVP,” why isn’t he being paid more?
A: Two reasons; clearly the questioner doesn’t understand the whole arbitration process. Just because Clippard is our best pitches doesn’t equate to him being the highest paid player. Veterans always make more than pre-arb guys; don’t forget the players belong to a Union, and Union members reward longevitiy. Secondly; Clippard unfortunately is a commodity player; he’s a non-closer reliever who doesn’t rack up saves and thus won’t ever be compensated like a Jonathan Papelbon or a Mariano Rivera, despite his value to the team. Its an unfair world in some respects, and I just hope that the Nats do him right and keep paying him while he’s productive for the team. Boswell mirrors my two thoughts but then also says that relievers are starting to become aware of newer stats like WPA that value Clippard highly (1st in the NL last year, above big name starters like Roy Halladay).
Q: What are your thoughts on the extra wild card?
A: Baseball purists may whine and complain, but the modern professional sports scene in this country, fortunately or unfortunately, places a ton of emphasis on playoffs versus regular season accomplishment. Even with these two additional WC teams, Baseball still has the fewest of its teams reaching the regular season of any of the four major sports. And, in a sport where payroll disparities may not determine the World Series victor every year they clearly help predict the playoff contendors (Yankees: one missed playoff appearance since 1994), having more teams in competition for the playoffs is good for the sport. Frankly I’d like to see Baseball go to a 32-team/8-division structure similar to the NFL and adopt the NFL’s exact playoff structure. The problem there is finding two more markets without cannibalizing the NY or LA market. Boswell says “time will tell,” but also admits that he hated the first WC round initially but likes it now. He also points out something I hadn’t thought of; the importance of your #3 starter with a new round of playoffs.
Q: Should the team just skip Strasburg’s start every few times to extend his 160IP limit until the end of the season?
A: It isn’t a bad idea; Zimmermann skipped one start and hit his 160IPs at roughly September 1st. So skipping a few more starts for Strasburg would put him well into September. But I don’t think he’ll be served well by jacking around his days rest. Starters depend on getting into routines in order to pitch their best. Honestly I think this situation may very well play it self out naturally; even in 2010 Strasburg had two separate DL stints; if he spends 30 days or so on the DL at various times we’ll get a full season out of him. Boswell agrees with me on the not-skipping-a-start theory.
Q: How secure is Ramos as the #1 catcher?
A: I’d say he’s pretty secure. Flores may have had a good winter, but winter leagues aren’t exactly MLB quality. Flores’ injury history has more or less derailed his career, and that’s unfortunate. The team has found a solid #1 in Ramos and will stick with him, with Flores getting his typical 1 or 2 starts a week. The inclusion of Derek Norris in the Gonzalez package also spoke volumes about where this team thinks it is in terms of catcher depth, as does the 40-man addition of Maldonado, a journeyman catcher who now benefits from a distinct lack of upper-level minor league catcher depth. Look for the team to make catcher a focus in the 2012 draft to start back up the catcher pipeline. In the mean time, I doubt Flores will be trade bait even if he performs amazingly well, at least until we find another catcher in the wings. Boswell says Ramos is as #1 as any #1 can be.
Q: Who are the best catchers ever?
A: For a combination of defense, calling games, arm strength as well as offense, i’d go with Johnny Bench. But you also have to throw in Ivan Rodriguez in his prime. Mike Piazza was notoriously bad defensively. Jorge Posada was subpar defensively in his later years but was a monster bat. I’d include other names from the past few decades like Carlton Fisk. Before Fisk and Bench, there was a dearth of HoF inductees from the catcher position for some 30 years, to Yogi Berra who is probably the benchmark for all-around catchers (with Bench). Boswell says Bench as well, but mentions Varitek with Posada. Interesting.
Q: What is the team going to do with Ian Desmond?
A: I’d guess that 2012 is the make it or break it year for Desmond. If he’s hitting .220 at the all-star break without significant value proven at the SS position, the team may make a change. Move Espinosa to SS, install DeRosa as starting 2B, look to move Desmond and perhaps make Lombardozzi the utility guy. I also find it very interesting that Anthony Rendon is getting reps at both 2B and SS; if that kind of hitter can slot in at short stop on even an as-needed basis he could be even more of a dangerous prospect than he already is. Boswell agrees; this is a big year for Desmond.
Q: If catcher is so important, why did we move Bryce Harper away from the position?
A: one word: longevity. Yeah he was a catcher growing up but catchers get the crap beat out of them, have constant injury concerns, and the wear and tear of catching affects their hitting. With such a bat potential, he needs to be on the field and playing 162 games. That being said, I was slightly surprised that he didn’t at least try to stick at C for at least a little bit of his career … but understand the reasoning stated. Boswell said the same things I said, but added that scouts didn’t really think he was a natural catcher anyway, so he got moved to the OF quickly.
Q: What would MLB’s response be to the same “bounty” scandal going on in the NFL?
A: Hard one; its not like purposeful bean-balls without context are common in the MLB. And the game is just too random to purposely try to spike someone, or slide into them on purpose, or to purposely hit a catcher. These plays are so bang-bang and so naturally occurring to baseball players who have played all their lives that they’re hard to script. If it was found out to be happening? Long suspensions. Boswell thinks such a situation would be lifetime bans, if proven.
Q: Strasburg has never pitched more than 7 innings, at any level, ever. Is this a concern?
A: I have a hard time believing this, but won’t challenge the questioner since I’m not entirely in a position to go searching through the guy’s college career. Is it a concern? eh. Its modern baseball. No more 150 pitch games, no more 38 start seasons. Little leaguers have pitch count/innings limits, high school teams only play twice a week. College rotations you go once a week. I’d only be concerned if he showed any inclination of slowing down later in games, which he doesn’t. Boswell isn’t concerned.
